सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने बार एसोसिएशनों में सुधार की आवश्यकता और अत्यधिक नामांकन शुल्क को असंवैधानिक करार दिया है, न्याय वितरण में पारदर्शिता का आह्वान किया।
ITAT Lucknow ruled that additions under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) are unsustainable without a valuation officer’s reference, directing deletion of ₹2.14 crore addition.
Digital Competition Bill marks a shift to ex-ante regulation in India, addressing anti-competitive practices before they occur, reflecting EU influences.
Explore if Power Purchase Agreements qualify as leases under Ind AS 116 and their implications on financial reporting and asset classification.
ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment under Section 148 due to improper approval process, emphasizing the need for compliance with Section 151 requirements.
Starting November 1, 2024, self-invoicing is mandatory for RCM transactions. Delays in issuance may lead to loss of ITC and penalties under the CGST Act.
ITAT Mumbai found DRP’s rejection of objections unjustified, remitting the Dresser-Rand case back to the AO for proper adjudication on Transfer Pricing issues.
ITAT Delhi held that assessments for defective returns must be made under Section 144, invalidating prior orders issued under Section 143(3).
ITAT Mumbai held that since deed of conveyance executed on 31.03.2017, provisions of section 56(2)(x) of Income Tax Act are not applicable. Section 56(2)(x) is inserted by Finance Act, 2017 and effective only from 01.04.2017.
ITAT Mumbai held that notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act and procedure adopted being per se illegal hence the notices deserves to be set aside/ quashed.
