Madras High Court held that initiation of recovery proceedings based on ex-parte order passed without considering the submissions is unjustified. Accordingly, writ allowed and CIT(A) directed to dispose of appeal.
ITAT Chennai held that failure to issue notice u/s. 143(2) of the Income Tax Act after issuing notice u/s. 147 and prior to finalizing the re-assessment vitiated the entire proceedings. Accordingly, order quashed.
Delhi High Court held that reinitiating of reassessment action u/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act on the same set of reasons on which assessment proceedings had already been concluded is unjustified and hence liable to be set aside.
ITAT Mumbai held that deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act admissible in respect of the interest on FDR and savings account earned by co-operating housing society from investment with the Co-operative Banks.
Madras High Court held that work contracts undertaken prior to 11.05.2002 cannot be brought under the purview of the tax net under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Accordingly, order set aside.
Madras High Court quashes GST show cause notice for one-day delay in GSTR-3B filing due to COVID-19. Extension recommended by GST Council considered key.
Jay Bhavani Mata Trust withdrew its appeal after successful registration under Section 12A. ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Punjab & Haryana High Court rules comparable used in ALP determination must be justified. The court dismisses Revenue’s appeal, upholding ITAT’s ruling.
When assessee had both trade receivables and trade payables, it would be unreasonable to calculate interest only on trade receivables for the purpose of determining the ALP of the transaction. AO/ TPO was directed to consider both trade payables and trade receivables for the purpose of notional interest to be charged for determining the ALP value of the transaction.
Learn how to calculate advance tax, payment deadlines, and exemptions. Find the steps for online payment and consequences of non-payment or delay.
