Madhya Pradesh High Court held that time gap of 8 days between show cause notice and impugned order reveals that reasonable opportunity of reply to show cause notice not granted. Accordingly, the show cause notice and order thereof set aside.
Bombay High Court held that AO is not entitled to commence proceedings for reassessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act based on change of opinion as material facts are fully and truly disclosed.
Kerala HC upholds tax demand as petitioner misses appeal deadline under Finance Act 1994, deems Order-in-Original valid. Read the full judgment.
Allahabad High Court, in a recent judgment, has clarified that a DNA test can be ordered only in exceptional cases when there is no other legal basis to determine parentage.
Delhi High Court’s ruling in VAB Apparel LLP vs Commissioner, setting aside GST registration cancellation order for non-specification of reasons for GST registration cancellation.
ITAT Mumbai held that as the assessee should be aware of the exact charge for which the penalty proceeding has been initiated, non-striking on the irrelevant limb under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act vitiates the entire penalty proceedings.
Kerala High Court held that addition to the capital account of the partner duly sustainable in law on account of failure of the assessee to furnish supporting evidence.
Delhi High Court held that there was no default in payment of advance as seized cash was offered by the assessee to be treated as advance tax.
ITAT Bangalore held that initiation of proceedings against the person other than the searched person under section 148, instead of section 153C, of the Income Tax Act is without any jurisdiction and hence held liable to be set aside.
Madras High Court held that as GST registration sought from retrospective date, the input tax credit ought to have provided. Accordingly, impugned order directing to forego Input Tax Credit is unreasonable and cannot be sustained.
