Join our webinar on July 24-25 for an in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2024. Learn about tax proposals, sector impacts, and investment insights. Register now!
Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC complexities. Register now!
Paramshakti Distributors Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT: ITAT Mumbai Deletes Addition of Share Application Money – Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness Proved
Learn about the case involving Noble Corporation and ITAT Mumbai restricting addition to 7% of value of bogus purchases. Discover the key documents and the ruling of Assessing Officer in this blog post.
Telangana High Court upholds GST liability on director’s personal guarantee. Ruling supports Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) under GST. Read the full judgment.
Gujarat High Court held that official of accused firm viz. IOCL, HPCL, BPCL and IBP are rightly discharged in the matter of selling HSD at concessional rates to private industries in absence of sufficient grounds for proceedings against them.
CESTAT Kolkata held that processing fee, transfer fee, administrative charges, etc. collected from land allottees as fixed by IDCO are statutory in nature. Accordingly, service tax is not leviable on the same.
CESTAT Bangalore held that rule 11 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 will be applicable for determination of assessable value of goods manufactured on job work basis.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that no reliance can be placed on statements of third party without tangible corroborative evidence. Accordingly, recovery of Cenvat Credit under rule 14 rightly dropped.
The present appeal has been filed by the revenue against order passed by the CIT(A) challenging action of CIT(A) in allowing carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation of Rs. 19,89,09,661/- pertaining to A.Y.s 1997-98 to 2000-01 for set off without any time limit.
Explore recent Supreme Court judgment allowing High Courts and Sessions Courts to grant interim anticipatory bail across states, emphasizing protection of citizens’ rights.
Bombay High Court held that amount received as per arbitration award by the appellant pursuant to a family arrangement is not chargeable to tax.
