Explore the recent decision of the Madras High Court in Erode District Tractor Owners Association Vs PCIT concerning an order passed under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court sets aside the order and calls for a fresh decision.
Learn about penalty imposed by MCA for violating the appointment of a women director rule under Section 149(1) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Explore the recent Gujarat High Court judgment in PCIT Vs KGY Glass Industries (P) Ltd regarding the denial of concessional tax rate due to a technical glitch in filing Form 10-IC under section 115BAA for AY 2020-21.
CESTAT Mumbai held that rule 6(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 provides for availment of entire amount of credit of input services even though certain portion must have been used in manufacture of exempted goods.
CESTAT Mumbai held that rule 10A of Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 [valuation rules] is effected only when inputs are supplied and sale is effected to the buyer by the Principal Manufacturer. Thus, Rule 10A of valuation rules doesn’t come into play for all manner of ‘job-work’.
Supreme Court concluded that the matter relating to true construction, meaning and import of the expression ‘vacant land’ contained in Section 2(q) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 should be placed before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India for appropriate directions.
Understand what qualifies as ‘stewardship activities’ for taxation in India with the Supreme Court’s single-entity approach. Taxes on stewardship activities, Morgan Stanley & Co v India judgement explained
Bombay High Court held that the reopening notice can be sustained only on the basis of the ground mentioned in the reasons recorded. It is not open to the revenue to add and/or supplement later the reasons recorded at the time of reopening notice. Accordingly, reassessment proceedings set aside.
Explore RBI Governor’s insights on economic impact and the necessity of both price and financial stability, highlighting India’s role in the global financial landscape.
ITAT Delhi held that services are rendered without transfer of technical knowledge, skill, know-how, etc. and accordingly the receipts doesn’t qualify as FIS (Fees for Included Services) under Article 12(4)(b) of the India – USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA).
