Held that the cash sales and corresponding cash deposits have been a regular feature of the business of the assessee and there is certainly no abnormal trend of cash sales and cash deposit during the demonetization period. Accordingly, addition deleted.
Held that payment of interest on cash loan falls within the ambit of unexplained expenditure within the meaning of Section 69C of the Income Tax Act.
CESTAT Chennai held that penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 imposable as CHA has abetted or facilitated, may be deliberate or negligent, an illegal attempted export of prohibited goods i.e. Red Sanders wood pillars and tops.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that as the service charges are based on metric tons of the goods handled and not on the basis of wages of laborers deployed for the job, the activity of the loading, unloading of goods at port, cutting of bags, spreading of zola, cleaning of jetty is classified under Cargo Handling Service.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that reopening of assessment u/s. 147 of the Income Tax Act after four years without any tangible material amounts to change of opinion and according the same is invalid and liable to be quashed.
CESTAT Mumbai dismisses Revenue’s application for review against DHL Lemuir Logistics, criticizes incorrect factual representation.
High Court can exercise revisional jurisdiction under Section 48 only against orders passed by Tax Tribunal either under Section 45(2) or 46(3) of H.P. VAT Act.
Explore critical judgment of ITAT Hyderabad in DCIT Vs Vessella Constructions concerning revenue recognition and sale of villas. Gain in-depth insights.
Analyzing the recent ITAT Jaipur ruling on Safiq Ahmad Vs ITO. Assessee penalized for failing to cooperate in penalty proceedings under Sections 271B & 271(1)(c) of the Act.
Detailed analysis of NCLAT Chennai’s ruling in K Parthiban Rasu Vs Umiya Development Centre India Pvt. Ltd. & SBI case. Learn how it impacts insolvency law.
