Learn about the landmark ruling of CESTAT Kolkata which stated that the processes of Re-Crystallisation and Distillation do not qualify as manufacture under the Central Excise Act, and the implications of this judgment on the appellant, Ganga Rasayanie.
The recent ITAT Chandigarh ruling in Gurdeep Singh Ubhi Vs DCIT asserts that additional business income without unexplained sources should be taxed at normal rates, challenging the application of Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
A landmark judgement from CESTAT clarifies that brand promotion carried out by IPL player Pinal Rohit Shah for Mumbai Indians does not fall under the category of Business Auxiliary Service. Understand the case details, analysis and implications here.
A critical judgement by CESTAT remands the case of Suraj Ropes, a defunct manufacturer, seeking a refund of unutilised CENVAT credit accumulated due to export under bond and LUT. Read on for a comprehensive analysis of the case.
Explore the ITAT Mumbai decision in the case of Maneken Keshvalla Patel Vs NFAC, where the appeal was reinstated despite discrepancies in PAN cited by the Assessee and Assessing Officer. Uncover the intricate details of the case.
The ITAT ruling in the case of ITO vs Hindustan Breweries clarifies that share capital credited via journal entries does not constitute ‘unexplained share capital’. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act.
Detailed analysis of the recent ITAT ruling in the case of Lear Automotive India Private Limited Vs ACIT, where engineering and development costs were classified as revenue expenditure.
Insightful overview of the CESTAT Ahmedabad’s decision in Deepali Suresh Padhiar Vs C.C.-Ahmedabad case, examining the implications for non-resident Indians unaware of Indian Baggage Rules.
Review of the Calcutta High Court’s judgment in the case Usha Gupta Vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, exploring the implications for penalties in instances of shortage in consignment quantity.
Case summary of Jochan Michael vs. Commissioner of Customs where CESTAT Kolkata upheld the confiscation of foreign-origin gold biscuits despite an error in the recorded statement.
