Gujarat High Court in case of Sampatraj Dharmichand Jain Vs ITO concludes that Reassessment notice issued beyond prescribed time period and based on unverified details is invalid.
CESTAT Ahmedabad, in case of Khushi Enterprise vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman, has upheld the right to a service tax refund on export of goods, emphasizing that an invoice to an agent is just as valid as an invoice to principal.
इसमें कोई शक नहीं कि दुनिया के लगभग सभी विकसित देश आर्थिक सुस्ती और मंहगाई से परेशान हैं और इसलिए अपने घरेलू सेक्टर पर तबज्जों दे रहे हैं, जिस कारण से विकासशील देशों से माल कम खरीद रहे हैं और ऐसे देश ढूंढ रहे हैं जो इनका माल खपा सकें. यही कारण है कि अमेरिका […]
Unpacking the latest CESTAT Chennai verdict on the PepsiCo India vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise case, exploring how PepsiCo India was granted the benefit of a 1% duty rate on fruit pulp following a reversal of ineligible credit.
The ITAT Delhi ruling in Arya Samaj Safdarjung Enclave Vs CIT sheds light on the reapplication process for 12A(1)(ac) registration erroneously submitted, encouraging a fresh approach to tax registration for non-profits.
Baskaran, the Karta of the HUF, submitted that his prolonged illness prevented him from managing the day-to-day activities of the business, causing the delay in filing the appeal. Despite this, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal, stating that the delay wasn’t sufficiently justified.
Explore the case of Satish vs ACIT where ITAT Delhi quashed an assessment order passed without giving the assessee an opportunity to respond, setting a vital legal precedent.
Delve into the case of Santi Kumar Oswal Vs ACIT where ITAT Kolkata ruled that no disallowance can be made for GST paid before the due date of filing ROI, emphasizing fair application of the Income Tax Act.
CESTAT Ahmedabad set a precedent in Hussain Sheth Ispat Vs Commissioner of Customs, ruling that Light Displacement Tonnage (LDT) is not relevant to the assessable value of goods, nullifying the differential duty demand.
Gain in-depth insights into the ITAT Kolkata’s landmark ruling on residential property deductions under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act. Learn how ownership of more than one house impacts tax deductions.
