In the case of Agrawal Pathshala Vs ITO, ITAT Delhi nullified CIT(A)’s dismissal due to a lack of substantive review on the grounds. The ITAT noted that dismissal was primarily due to a delay in filing, not a case assessment.
ITAT Pune calls for re-examination in the case of Kunashni Foundation Vs CIT after the rejection of applications under Section 80G and 12A of the Income Tax Act. The appellant argued a lack of opportunity to present evidence.
Calcutta High Court allows writ petition in the case of L.G. Balakrishnan & Bros Limited Vs ACIT, setting aside an earlier rejection of appeal due to a delay of 148 days. The court sets a cost of Rs. 40,000/- to be paid to WBGST Authority.
ITAT Mumbai remanded the matter to jurisdictional AO for de novo adjudication since the assessee was not able to furnish the documents at the time of assessment proceedings and the documents furnished before CIT(A) were not considered/ verified.
ITAT Delhi held that TUFS (Technology Up-gradation Fund Scheme) was introduced by the Government to provide subsidy on loan taken for technological upgradation by the units in the textile industry and hence interest reimbursement received by the assessee is a capital receipt.
A landmark decision by ITAT Chennai reinforces the validity of capital gain deductions under Section 54, even when flat possession is delayed. Explore the key aspects and implications of the Anil Kirthisimhan Wijeyanayake Vs ACIT case.
Discover SEBI’s consultation paper on delisting of non-convertible debt securities and the proposed mechanism for voluntary delisting. Learn about the reasons for delisting, scope and applicability, obtaining in-principle approval, and the final delisting application process.
Avoid common mistakes while filing your ITR. Select the correct form, match income with Form 16 and Form 26AS, disclose necessary details, claim proper deductions, and verify your return promptly. Seek expert advice for accurate tax planning.
“Delve into the details of the ESIC Act 1948, its applicability across India, and the procedures for correctly paying contributions under the Act. Learn about your responsibilities as an employer and the potential repercussions of non-compliance.
In Sri Gopal Store vs AO case, Orissa High Court ruled that a minimum of seven days must be provided for compliance with a show cause notice in faceless assessment proceedings
