CESTAT Kolkata held that rejection of refund claim of sugar cess on the ground of pendency of proceedings when no stay has been given by any higher court is unjustified.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition as unexplained credits to capital account unsustainable as gift from assessees aunt shown as credits to capital account.
Bombay High Court held that certificates issued by the Singapore Tax Authorities certifying that capital gain income would be brought to tax in Singapore is sufficient evidence for accepting the legal position.
ITAT Indore rules in favor of Manish Kumar Girdhari Lal Lath Vs ACIT, accepting assessee’s explanation due to lack of full information on credit card expenditure reported by third-party agencies, highlighting the importance of providing complete details for fair assessment.
In the 2004 case of Ekram Singh, it was held that if a defective part arises and a warranty situation arises, the manufacturer’s credit note is taxable. The credit note has to be issued by the manufacturer to the dealer of automobiles.
Stay informed about the latest amendments under SEBI (LODR) Regulations with our quick overview. Explore changes in timelines, corporate governance norms, financial results, and more. Get a comprehensive understanding of the updates to ensure compliance and effective governance.
HC set aside the order passed by the Appellate Authority and remanded back the matter to Appellate Authority to pass a fresh speaking order after giving petitioners an opportunity of being heard, as the assessee had duly prepared the e-way bill within 3 minutes of the interception of the vehicle.
Discover the impact of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court’s ruling on the provisional attachment of bank accounts under GST. Learn about the one-year validity period and the importance of complying with Section 83 of the CGST Act. Stay informed to protect your interests.
Telangana High Court allowed credit for advance tax and TDS resulting into refund of Rs. 51.66 Crores on upload of migration order which was earlier not able to be uploaded.
ITAT Mumbai held that as the assessee ceases to be an ‘eligible assessee’ under provisions of section 144C of the Income Tax Act, extended time limit for assessment is not available to AO. Accordingly, order of TPO is barred by limitation.
