Bombay High Court held that refusal to renew the courier licence registration in international carriage under the Courier Imports and Exports (Clearance) Regulations 1998 without granting an opportunity to explain is unjustified.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that all necessary details and evidences to establish genuineness of the unsecured loans duly furnished by the assessee, accordingly, addition towards the same unsustainable.
NFRA undertook Financial Reporting Quality Review of Standalone Financial Statements of PSP Projects Ltd. on the basis of NFRA’s statistical sampling approach.
Stay compliant with GST regulations in March 2023! Check out the comprehensive compliance calendar for GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, and other GST returns and forms.
Mohd. Abdul Khaliq Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) The Allahabad High Court recently in Mohd. Abdul Khaliq vs. State of U.P. and Another Application u/s 482 No.1743 of 2021 decided on 14-02-2023 considered the various provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 Act. The Court explicitly observed for the […]
The Author in this article discusses the differing views taken by two high courts (exactly opposing views) on the question of limitation as to whether proceedings for AY 2013-14 and AY 2014-15 can be re-opened by issuing notice u/s 148 (deemed to be 148(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the ITA] from 01-Apr-2021 to 30-Jun-2021. (the Specified Period)).
Discover the colorful updates in GST & Income Tax this Holi! From GST Amnesty schemes to new tax regimes, understand the hues of joy & worry for taxpayers.
Explore the potential of the aviation sector post-COVID, with rising domestic traffic, mega aircraft orders, government schemes, FDI, and market analysis.
ITAT Rajkot held that penalty under section 271F of the Income Tax Act not leviable as post search there was delay in providing seized documents. Further, Checking, cross checking and reconciliation of datas was a very lengthy process is also a reasonable cause for non-furnishing of income tax return.
Delhi High Court held that in terms of rule 24 of the ITAT Rules, when the Tribunal has ex-parte disposed of the appeal on merits and thereafter the appellant appears, the Tribunal shall set aside the ex-parte order and restore the appeal if sufficient cause is shown.
