ITAT Kolkata held that company incorporated on 07.11.2012 and valuation of share done on 16.11.2012, therefore share premium on issue of equity share capital and issue of preference share capital are hit by provisions of section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act and hence addition towards share premium sustained.
Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the circular issued by District Central Cooperative Banks as the circular merely sought to bring to the notice of the petitioner societies the statutory provisions in regard to the deduction of tax, enjoining that they adhere to and comply with the same.
NCLAT Chennai held that the word Person, is defined as per Section 3 (23)(d) of the I & B Code, which includes a Trust, therefore, there is no Fetter / Embargo or a Legal Impediment, for a Trust, to be a Resolution Applicant, in submitting a Resolution Plan
ITAT Bangalore held that rental income is inseparably connected with the business carried on by the assessee and emanate directly from the business of the undertaking. Accordingly, rental income derived by the assessee from Cargo Agents, Airlines, Banks etc., is derived from the cargo business and eligible for deduction u/s. 80IA. The addition is deleted.
CESTAT Delhi held that as the goods are not being notified under section 123 of the Act, it is onus on the revenue to establish the smuggled nature of the goods. In absence of any evidence, allegation of smuggled nature unsustainable.
Gujarat High Court held that provisional attachment of property under section 83 of the CGST Act can be invoked only during pendency of certain proceedings. In absence of any initiation of proceedings, powers of provisional attachment cannot be exercised.
Streamline your companys financial operations with our Board Resolutions. Learn how to close bank accounts efficiently, specifying the process for immediate closure. Also, gain insights into appointing a Chief Executive Officer, ensuring compliance with legal requirements. Download our expertly crafted resolutions for a smooth and secure corporate governance process.
ITAT held that invocation of provision of 263 to correct section under which penalty is leviable or not is beyond the power vested under section 263 of Income Tax Act,
Provisions of Section 16 and Rule 37 governs implications to recipient who has availed ITC but has failed to pay to supplier, the payment towards value of supply and tax thereon within prescribed time period.
Pursuant to discussions with the Stock Exchanges, with a view to ensure uniformity in the reporting of monthly developments and activities at the Stock Exchanges, the formats of the MDR and MAR have been revised and copies of the same are enclosed as Annexure A and Annexure B, respectively.
