Many businesses that want to outsource all of their human resources use PEOs. They want to minimize their risk and liability while reaping the benefits of collective bargaining such as compensation, payroll, and other costs related to the PEO Human Resources.
Gujarat High Court in case of Shree Govind Alloys Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Gujarat held that mere expiry of e-way bill during transit of vehicle cannot be a valid ground for detention and seizure.
CESTAT held that custom brokers are not responsible for overseeing correctness of documents provided by client issued by government authorities for verification of exporters as per Regulation.
India has the largest Diaspora population in the world with 18 million people from country living outside their homeland. Many NRI who resides outside India earns income from India. The income mainly includes interest income, capital gains on sale of property, rental income, gains on sale of shares, mutual funds and bonds.
It was the specific case of Mr. Chandubhai Bhagwandas Patel wherein even though Form GSTR-1 for the month of August 2019 was correctly filed declaring all the relevant details qua outward supplies appropriately, refund of IGST paid upon export of goods was denied to the petitioner due to mistake being committed in Form GSTR-3B for the said month.
Unlock the details of the New Interest Subvention Scheme for short-term Agricultural loans with the latest modifications effective from 23.11.2022. Explore changes for FY 2022-23 and 2023-24, understanding interest subvention, benefits, and eligibility criteria. Stay informed on the latest financial developments.
Sai Kripa Confectioneries Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) Provisional attachment of bank account along with credit ledger account was unblocked on the admission of the Commissioner that there was an error in judgement. Alert made as risky exporter was also removed. The Petitioner challenged the attachment of bank accounts, blocking of credit ledger […]
ITAT Jaipur held that additions on account of LIC Premia treated as unexplained investment deleted as merely based on rough notings without any substantive evidence.
ITAT Delhi held that in case of limited scrutiny, AO cannot exceed the jurisdiction beyond the one which he has carved out himself in the notice issued for limited scrutiny. Addition beyond his jurisdiction is unsustainable.
