The company in its application has submitted that the CIN was not printed in the company’s business letters, bill heads etc. upto 2021. Hence the company has violated the provisions of Section 12(3)(c) of Companies Act, 2013.
Merely, because the assessee’s PAN number was mentioned as he was the Director of one of the company, the purchase cannot be said to be made by him when the purchase has been shown in the P&L account by the said company itself as well as part of the closing stock of the said company, namely, Iscon Procon Pvt. Ltd.
Kalaignar TV Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) The assessee has claimed legal expenses and travelling & conveyance expenses before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer mainly disallowed the expenditure claimed by the assessee on the ground that the legal proceedings was undertaken in respect of the charges framed against the Directors and shareholders of […]
Co-browsing, also known as collaborative browsing, allows the Helpdesk agents to collaborate with the taxpayer’s browser in real-time, just at the click of a button. Agents can view and securely co navigate the Taxpayer’s browser screen and guide them interactively to deliver real-time and personalized support.
In re Gurmat Impex & Shipping Services (CAAR Mumbai) Gas lift/Gas spring merits classification under sub-heading 9401 9900 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MUMBAI M/s. Gurmat Impex & Shipping Services (hereinafter referred to as ‘applicant’) has filed the present advance […]
As per the explanatory notes to Heading 73.25 which provides for exclusion of ‘castings which are products falling in other headings of the Nomenclature (e.g., recognizable parts of machinery or mechanical appliances) or unfinished castings which require further working but have attained the essential character of such finished products, the subject goods do not merit classification under Heading 7325.
CESTAT Mumbai held that amended rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 prescribes the formula for claiming refund of service tax by the service provider. Under such amended rule in vogue, there is no requirement of satisfying the nexus between the input service and the output service and hence order rejecting refund claim for the finding on nexus is not in accordance with law.
As individuals, one of our most important financial responsibilities is to grow our wealth. In order to grow wealth, it is important to make smart financial decisions.
CESTAT Chennai held that as the debit note doesnt contain the nature of taxable service provided by the other party to the appellant, such debit note cannot be considered a valid document as per Rule 9 of CCR, 2004 and hence CENVAT Credit ineligible.
Explore the impact of SEBIs Sixth Amendment to Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements, focusing on changes in independent director appointments, financial statements, and disclosure norms. Gain insights into regulatory enhancements shaping corporate governance.
