In re Continental Engineering Corporation (GST AAAR Telangana) Whether GST payable on the claim of Rs. 2,20,00,000/- for the HGCL share of sitting fee and other expenses paid by the applicant on the directions of the Arbitrators for an amount 1. On this count, the lower authority had held that Arbitration as service was supplied […]
The jurisdictional tax officer and the counterpart tax officer shall verify the transitional credit claimed under the CGST or the SGST head, as the case may be, by referring to the guidelines detailed in Annexure I
Whether the formula prescribed under sub-rule (5) of rule 89 of the CGST Rules, 2017 for calculation of refund of unutilised input tax credit on account of inverted duty structure, as amended vide Notification No. 14/2022-Central Tax dated 05.07.2022, will apply only to the refund applications filed on or after 05.07.2022, or whether the same will also apply in respect of the refund applications filed before 05.07.2022 and pending with the proper officer as on 05.07.2022?
Fixation of Tariff Value of Edible Oils, Brass Scrap, Areca Nut, Gold and Silver- Notification No. 93/2022-CUSTOMS (N.T.) | Dated: 10th November, 2022 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS) NOTIFICATION New Delhi Notification No. 93/2022-CUSTOMS (N.T.) | Dated: 10th November, 2022 S.O. 5241(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred […]
Mukesh D. Ramani Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) It is settled law that liability for duty of the company cannot be fastened upon the Directors of the company unless there is statutory provision to that effect. Since the BST Act did not contain any provision to the effect making the Directors liable for […]
Supreme Court held that as per regulation 114(4) of the Company Secretaries Regulations, 1982 election can be challenged by the candidate concerned. Hence, writ petition filed by the petitioner not contesting the election of office bearers to the High Court was wrongly entertained.
NCLAT Delhi held that Financial Creditors can invoke the proceedings under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the Guarantor, who on default of Principal Borrower transforms into Corporate Debtor
ITAT Delhi held that reasons recorded for reopening of assessment u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act doesnt disclose that income has escaped assessment due to failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all the material facts and hence assessment order passed thereon are quashed.
ITAT Mumbai held that assessment proceedings were initiated on the basis of search operation carried out at third party wherein incriminating documents relating to assessee were allegedly found. Hence, assessment was required to be framed u/s 153C read with section 153A of the Income Tax Act and not u/s 144 and hence the said proceedings are quashed.
CESTAT Delhi uphold the order of revocation of registration of the authorized courier and forfeiture of security on account of actively violated the provisions of the act and rules by knowingly filing the bills of entry in the name of wrong consignee and also be mis-declaring the nature of the goods.
