Simplify GST learning with memory techniques. Join live sessions, master CGST sections, and retain knowledge effortlessly. Register now for practical GST mastery!
ITAT Mumbai held that freight charges received from transportation of cargo through feeder vessels being part of shipping income in International Traffic is covered under Article–9(1) of the India–France Tax Treaty and hence not taxable in India.
ITAT Kolkata held that interest on income tax refund is a ‘debt claim’ payable by the Revenue in terms of Article 12(3)(a) of the India-Italy Treaty and thus such interest is not taxable and no TDS ought to be done by the AO.
ITAT Pune held that addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) of Income Tax Act sustainable as assessee failed to prove that the developer had agreed to share its developed area; which in turn, had come to the assessee from his father by way of nomination.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that as the additional evidence produced clearly indicates that company has put to use the windmill turbine in the year, depreciation on the same is available.
ITAT Kolkata held that service tax collected by the assessee on the amount paid to it for rendering the services is not to be included in the gross receipts for the purpose of computing the presumptive income of the assessee u/s. 44BBA of the Income Tax Act.
Taxpayers of Daman and Diu & Ladakh are hereby informed that they can file or revise their TRAN-1 or TRAN-2 Forms only through their newly allotted GSTINs. Kindly do not use the old GSTIN for filing of TRAN forms.
Understand the difference between Swift Message and Purpose Codes. Learn how SWIFT mechanism replaced telegraphic transfers for secure bank transfers.
R.P. Polypacks Pvt. Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In brief, the issue according to the ld. Commissioner is that the assessee had made provision of Excise Duty, which was not an allowable expenditure and ld. Assessing Officer has erred in accepting this claim of the assessee in an assessment order passed under section 143(3) of […]
Dinesh Babu Saxena Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) As against the penalty order dated 30/09/2016, the assessee has preferred the Appeal before the CIT(A) with a delay of more than 12 months. It is the specific case of the assessee before the CIT(A) that the assessee has not received any notice u/s 271(1)(c) or the order […]
Doubts have been raised as to which pension i.e pension authorized at the time of retirement or the pension revised subsequently and payable at the time of application for commutation shall be allowed to be commuted.
