Karnataka High Court held that once the dividend is paid by the company, SEBI has no power to initiate any action against the company or its directors who have defaulted in payment of dividend as specified under Section 207 of the Companies Act, 1956.
ITAT Jaipur held that equalization levy not applicable as role of the assessee is merely conduit between the entity carrying out the advertisement and Google. The ultimate benefit of such advertisement is not desired by the assessee.
NCLT Hyderabad held that dismissed the application of corporate debtors as provisions of rule 43 of the NCLT Rules empowers the Adjudicating Authority, and not to the corporate debtors, to seek production of documents.
Understand Section 44B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with amendments. Learn about the tax implications for non-resident individuals engaged in shipping business.
1) Rule 5 of NFRA Rules 2018 (as amended from time to time) auditors of class of companies specified in Rule 3 of the above referred Rules are required to file with NFRA an annual return in specified form viz. NFRA-2, on or before 30th November every year. However, in order to provide sufficient time, […]
Court is of the view that every Assessment Year is a separate unit which is governed by its own peculiar facts and difference of opinion between the parties, as to the appropriateness of one or the other methods to calculate arm’s length price, cannot per se be a ground for interference
HC directs Department of Industry to take requisite steps to make West Bengal State Support Industries Scheme, 2008 GST-compliant within a period of 16 weeks
DCIT Vs Prabhat Agri Biotech Limited (ITAT Hyderabad) It is a fact that the assessee supplies seeds to its distributors located in the states of Kerala, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka and after the season is complete the sales distributors identify the stock of seeds of various varieties which are not sold by the end of […]
Loans been taken by Assessee from a sister concern in cash to make payments to labourers at site. This was held to be a reasonable explanation
It is trite law, valid service of notice under section 148 of the Act is sine qua non for proceeding under section 147 of the Act. In absence of valid service of notice under section 148 of the Act, the assessment proceeding under section 147 of the Act has to be declared as invalid.
