existing forms of ITR and TAR do not capture details of exports and imports undertaken during the respective FY by any entity engaged in Gems and Jewellery business.
SAT held that annual listing fee payable inspite of suspension on Trading of Securities. Listing & trading of securities are distinct terms
SC has held that the assessee is entitled to claim mutuality in respect of entrance fee collected from these non-voting right members.
R.S. Diamonds India Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) The Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has deposited a sum of Rs. 45 lakhs into its bank account during demonetization period. It was explained that the above said amount represented cash balance available in its books of account, which included advance received from the customers […]
PCIT Vs Burdwan Development Authority (Calcutta High Court) On perusal of the order passed by the tribunal HC find that the tribunal has rightly taken note of the legal position and granted relief to the assessee. Apart from that, the tribunal has also noted the factual position and relevant details were called for. The assessing […]
Tax Recovery Officer ( TRO) could not have examined, whether transfer was void under Section 281 and that his adjudication of the transfer as being void under Section 281
PCIT Vs Crescent Construction Co (Bombay High Court) The purpose of the amendment made by the Finance Act, 2010 is to solve the anomalies that the insertion of section 40(a)(ia) was causing to the bonafide tax payer. The amendment, even if not given operation retrospectively, may not materially be of consequence to the Revenue when […]
ICSI is organizing Convocation of the Southern Region for awarding the certificate of membership to its Associate and Fellow members admitted during the period from 1st October, 2021 to 31st March, 2022
SC held that Service Tax cannot be levied again on antivirus software sold in Compact Disc even if free updates provided later on and also, artificial segregation of the transaction, into two parts is not tenable in law.
HC held that tax liability imposed on assessee is valid as assessee was aware of transaction alleged as ineligible on which ITC was availed
