Bharat Rana Chaudhry Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT find that sub-clause (iii) of section 271(l)(c) provides mechanism for quantification of penalty. It contemplates that the assessee would be directed to pay a sum in addition to taxes, if any, payable him, which shall not be less than but which shall not exceed three times the […]
Sh. Prem Pal Gandhi Vs ACIT (ITAT Amritsar) The appellant objected to the levy of penalty as bad in law. He challenged that the AO has not mentioned under which limbs of section 27 1(1)(c) of the Act, whether for concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, the penalty was initiated. Thus, He has […]
Sri Sivajothi Spinning Mills Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) ITAT heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. The ld. CIT(A) (NFAC) has rejected the appeal filed by the assessee on the ground that the due date for filing the appeal was 30.03.2020 and […]
Balani Infotech P. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) It is for an assessee as a businessman to come to a conclusion as to what remuneration of the salary is to be paid to the employees and the reasonableness of the expenses is to be judged from the angle of a businessman rather than from angle […]
Understanding Section 9 of the CGST Act, 2017: Learn about the levy and collection of GST for intrastate supplies and the prescribed payment methods.
Central Goods and Service Tax Vs Pawan Kumar Sharma (Patiala House Court) By way of the instant order, I propose to dispose of the application moved on behalf of applicant/accused Pawan Kumar Sharma for grant of bail. It is submitted that on 12.05.2022, the house of applicant/accused situated at Chandni Chowk, Delhi was searched by […]
The issue involved in this appeal is as to whether the appellant had provided cargo handling service for the period 01.04.2007 to 30.05.2007 and mining service for the period 01.06.2007.
DCIT Vs Apple Metal Industries Pvt Ltd (ITAT Delhi) Assessment for Assessment Year 2011-12 was completed after making addition on account of unverified share application money amounting to Rs. 8,70,71,936/- and in Assessment Year 2014-15, addition on account of unverified share capital amounting to Rs. 30,00,600/- was made. The impugned assessment order clearly shows that […]
Armajaro Trading India (P) Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin) In the instant case, one of the reasons for limited scrutiny was for the purpose of examining whether the share application money received by the assessee was genuine and was from disclosed sources. It is seen that the assessee had shown an amount of Rs.2,55,94,110 as […]
DCIT Vs Michelin ROH Co. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has a company incorporated in Thailand and offers a number of services, such as, business planning and coordination, engineering services, product research and development etc. to its Indian subsidiary. On offering these engineering services, the assessee obtained a […]
