Carry bag made of virgin or recycled plastic, shall not be less than seventy-five microns in thickness with effect from the 30th September, 2021 and one hundred and twenty (120) microns in thickness with effect from the 31st December. 2022.
Pur Opale Creations Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is an undisputed fact that the assessee has disclosed particulars of loss in sale of assets before the authorities below. Instead of treating a loss as capital loss the assessee has treated the same as business loss and therefore, it cannot be said to have not […]
Sanjeev Gajendra Pancholi Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Perusal of the above gift deed shows that the donor viz. Shri Narendra Maganbhai Pancholi has sold piece of agriculture land from 28.3.2008 to 30.3.2008 and one agriculture land on 26.7.1999 aggregating to Rs.11,64,698/-. The donor claimed that this amount has been invested in private bank, shroff and […]
Ester Industries Ltd Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) This Court is of the view that the petitioner/assessee has the right to get adequate time in accordance with the Act to submit its reply. It is pertinent to mention that Section 148A(b) permits the Assessing Officer to suo moto provide up to thirty day’s period to […]
CIT (TDS) Vs Tata Teleservices Ltd. (Delhi High Court) Whether the ITAT was correct in holding that no TDS under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act was required to be deducted by the assessee on payment of interconnect user charges as it could not be categorized as fee for technical services? Admittedly, the Karnataka […]
Harish Aswal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has submitted all documentary evidences before the authorities below including ledger account of Centurian Bank Account No.442756061 available at page 108 to 138 of assessee’s Paper Book before the AO as well as before Ld.CIT(A) which clearly shows that the […]
Element of consciousness in furnishing inaccurate particulars of income coupled with circumstantial evidences should be present in the particular case.
Vice Chairman Settlement Commission Vs Zyeta Interiors Pvt. Ltd (Karnataka High Court) Whatever the ratio, the tax in its entirety has reached the hands of the ex-chequer. Merely for the reason that there was no strict adherence to the ratio as envisaged during the relevant point of time for payment of tax insofar as the assessee and […]
Prem Brothers Infrastructure LLP Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre (Delhi High Court) This Court is of the opinion that the only addition in the assessment order framed is in respect of disallowance under section 14A of the Act. The Petitioner has made a disallowance of Rs.3,20,14,010/- which was recomputed by the Assessing Officer at Rs.6,82,45,759/-. […]
CBDT Circular no. 9/2020 dated 22/04/2020, question no. 19, clearly enables the assessee to avail Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme to avail VSV only for one proceeding , even when two parallel proceedings were pending before appellate forums.
