D. Vidya Sagar Vs Union of India (Telangana High Court) Validity of Toll Tax when taxes required under Motor Vehicles Act (Road Tax) are been paid The petitioners before this Court, who are advocates and owners of Hyundai Creta and Hyundai 1-20 and they have stated that while purchasing the cars, they have paid taxes […]
Rolex Watch Company Private Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST & Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai) On perusal of the contract, it is seen that there are two obligations that devolve on the appellant, viz, promotion and marketing of Rolex watches in India and undertaking repairs/replacement during the warranty period for which neither the customer nor the […]
The Vardhman Developers Vs Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) We take notice that service tax law was revamped w.e.f. 01.07.2012 by bringing in various changes. We also take notice of the TRU/CBEC letter dt. 20.02.2010 regarding the scope of valuation of taxable amount in respect of residential complex service, which was introduced […]
Google LLC Vs JCIT (OSD) (ITAT Bangalore) The Tribunal has held that the where the delay in the disposal of pending appeal is not attributable to the assessee, the tribunal has power to extend the stay beyond a period of 365 days even after the amendment of the third proviso to section 254(2A) w.e.f 1st […]
Rakesh Janghu Vs Circle, 33(1) (ITAT Delhi) On perusal of the records, we observe that the Assessing Officer has made the impugned addition on the ground that the assessee has deposited employee’s contribution towards Provident Fund and ESI amounting to Rs.2,32,41,551/- after due date as prescribed under the relevant Act/ Rules in breach of Explanation […]
There was no ill-motive behind for not filing appeal in time and assessee had also filed affidavit, stating the reasons and requested Tribunal to condone the delay which occurred due to administrative lapse on part of his representative.
Bengal Beverages Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata) Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the Appellant is engaged in the manufacture and clearance of Aerated water and Fruit based drinks (in short ‘final products’) classifiable under Chapter- 22 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 on payment of […]
Luit Developers Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise it is trite law that figures of Form 26AS are not to be used for determining Service Tax liability unless there is proof to show that it was on account of any taxable service and relies on the order of the Tribunal in Kush […]
Whether Income from Sub-leasing of properties will be considered as Income from Profits and Gain from Business or Profession (Section 28) or Income form House Property (Section 22).
