Assesssee was admitted to bail linked to bank loan fraud arrested by the Enforcement Directorate under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court as it was not the case of the prosecution that the accused was of such character and stature that his mere presence at large would intimidate the witnesses and there was no material on record to show that if released on bail, he would tamper with the evidence or subvert the course of justice.
CIT Vs True Value Homes (India) Pvt. Ltd (Madras High Court) In this case Ashok Gupta is the Managing Director and in terms of the Board resolution is entitled to receive commission for services rendered to the company. It is a term of employment on the basis of which he had rendered service. Accordingly, he […]
QRMP- A headache we never asked Half baked solution & probably Worst Innovation of GSTN ARTICLE ON PROBLEMS / LIMITATIONS in QRMP SCHEME QRMP- It is introduced as ‘Quarterly Return Filing and Monthly Payment of Taxes (QRMP)’ scheme under GST to help the taxpayers having turnover less than Rs. 5 crores. QRMP as we all […]
ACIT Vs IKEA Trading (India) Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) We find that the assessee has sold assets at the WDV of the assets as per company law whereas the TPO held that the assessee ought to have sold the assets at the value of the WDV of the block of assets as per the Income […]
DCIT Vs GHCL Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad) During the course of assessment, the assessee has submitted that foreign exchange gain/loss should be considered as part of operational income mainly stating that receipts/expenditures are booked at the time of transaction while conversion of payment/receipts of foreign exchange occurs at a later point of time resulting into foreign […]
(i) Mr. Venkatesan, by not performing his duty of preparing IM and outsourcing the same to EY, has contravened sections 25(2)(g), 29, 208(2)(a) and (e) of the Code, Regulation 7(2)(a) and (h) of IP Regulations and clause 5 of the Code of Conduct. (ii) Mr. Venkatesan, by allowing the use of his name by the […]
CBDT directs that following categories of cases be considered as ‘potential cases’ for taking action u/s 148 of Act by 31.03.2021 for the A.Y 2013-14 to A.Y 2017-18 by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer
Under section 10 of Vivad se Vishwas, it is hereby clarified that where designated authority has passed orders under section 5(1) & (2) of Vivad se Vishwas, the Assessing Officer shall pass consequential order.
The Income Tax Department is carrying out search and survey operations which started on 03.03.2021 on two leading film production companies, a leading actress and two Talent Management companies in Mumbai. Search operation is being carried out at Mumbai, Pune, Delhi and Hyderabad.
The Income Tax Department carried out search and seizure operations on 03-03-2021on two groups of civil contractors in Southern Tamil Nadu. Searches and surveys were conducted in 18 premises mainly in Madurai and Ramnad districts.
