Every company is governed in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 therefore, it is mandatory for all companies to keep the Registrar of Companies informed about the location of the registered office and changes.
As stated in Section 173(2) of Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 3 of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, The participation of directors in a meeting of the Board may be either in person or through video conferencing or other audio visual means as may be prescribed
After commencement of Companies Act, 2013 from 01st April, 2014 compliance requirement of Companies has been increased. Therefore it’s difficult for the Non-working Private Company to continue with Status of Active Company, because maintenance of company is expensive (like to Maintain a White Elephant) under companies Act, 2013 comparison to Companies Act, 1956
Under the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, provisions of closure of place of business of foreign Company in India is prescribed.
The Reduction of share capital is a delicate matter for both managerially and legally, its need to be handles with caution. Another name of reduction of share capital is internal reconstruction. Process of Reduction of share capital is first summed- up by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Punjab Distilleries India Ltd. v. CIT, (1965) 35 Com Cases 541, 544
Under the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, offences committed under the Act entail penal consequences by way of fine, or imprisonment or both. . In this editorial, the author begins by referring the provisions of section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013
In this Flash editorial, the auditor begins by referring the powers of RBI for amendment in Regulation, 2000. The main thrust of the article, however, is upon the provisions / regulations of Foreign Direct Investment in Limited Liability Partnership
In view of the above observations, the view taken by the First Appellate Authority, that deposit under Section 35F (i) cannot be made from CENVAT Credit Account, is not the correct appreciation of law so long as the CENVAT Credit is permissible for utilisation as per Rule 3(4) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Accordingly, appeal filed by the appellant is allowed by way of remand to the ld.Commissioner(Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits without insisting on any further pre-deposit. All issues are kept open. Appellant be granted adequate opportunity of hearing to present their case. Both sides are at liberty to produce evidences in their favour.
HC held that that it was inappropriate and illegal on the part of Director General, Income Tax (Exemptions) not to take a decision on Assessee’s application filed for seeking approval as required under Section 80IB(7)(c).
Hc held that opinion that such a huge tax evasion cannot be so lightly permitted on account of any hyper-technicality. The concept of lift or piercing of corporate veil, as sometimes referred to as cracking the corporate shell, is applied by the Courts sparingly
