"October, 2015" Archive - Page 30

S. 254 Tribunal can consider the plea not raised before CIT (A)

Fast Booking (I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court)

Delhi High Court has held In the case of Fast Booking (I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT that Under Section 254 Tribunal has inherent power to entertain alternative plea of which was not urged before CIT(A). High Court Directed the Tribunal to consider the Plea of the Assessee that in case he is denied benefit ...

Read More

SEBI issues Format of Simplified uniform Listing Agreement

Circular No. CIR/CFD/CMD/6/2015 (13/10/2015)

A listed entity which has previously entered into agreement(s) with a recognised Stock Exchange(s) to list its securities shall execute a fresh listing agreement with such Stock Exchange within six months of the date of notification of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 20...

Read More

Refund Under GST- Not an Easy Nut to Crack

The report of Joint committee of Business processes for GST, gives us the glimpse of what is going to happen in the GST regime. Based on the report, following are the situations where the possibility for refund under GST arises. Below mentioned table tries to cover all related provisions recommended by committee to get the refund sanction...

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax |

Notification No. 79/2015 – Income Tax Dated 13/10/2015

Notification No. 79/2015 - Income Tax (13/10/2015)

Notification No. 79/2015 - Income Tax Dated: October 13, 2015- Corrigendum to Notification No. 50/2014 or S.O.2752(E) dated 22 October 2014...

Read More

Notification No. 98/2015-Customs (N.T.) Dated: October 12, 2015

Notification No. 98/2015-Customs (N.T.) (12/10/2015)

NOTIFICATION NO. 98/2015-CUSTOMS (N.T.) In exercise of the powers conferred under section 4 and section 5 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby appoints the officers mentioned in column (2) of the Table below as Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs for the purpose of adjudicatin...

Read More

Admissibility of HRA on non-acceptance or surrender of railway residential accommodation

No. E(P&A)II-2012/F.E.2/4 (12/10/2015)

During a meeting held on 15.07.2015 with the Board and the NFIR on the subject mentioned above. the Federation pointed out that railway quarters which are unfit for occupation or in a dilapidated condition are being allotted by the railway administration in the Zonal Railways/Units and thereby the affected railway employees are being deni...

Read More

Delhi VAT-Appointment of Assistant Commissioner cum VATO

No. F.3(11)/Fin(T&E)/2009-10/DS-VI/849 (12/10/2015)

alue Added Tax Act, 2004 (Delhi Act 3 of 2005), read with rule 47 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Rules, 2005, the Lt. Governor of the National Capital Territory of Delhi is pleased to appoint the following DANICS (probationers 54th batch) officers as Assistant Commissioners cum VATO for the training programme form 21/12/2015 to 08/01/2016. ...

Read More

Delhi VAT- Extension of Due date for filing online returns for 1st & 2nd quarters of 2015-16

No.F.3(515)/Policy/VAT/2015/870-81 (12/10/2015)

In partial modification of Notification No.F.3(515)/Policy/VAT/2015/805-816 dated 29/09/2015, I, Vijay Kumar, Commissioner, Value Added Tax in exercise of the powers conferred under section 27 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act,2004, do hereby extend the last date for filing of online returns for the 1st and 2nd quarters of the year 2015-16...

Read More

Proof of demand of illegal gratification must for conviction, mere recovery of notes not sufficient- SC

P. Satyanarayana Murthy Vs The Dist. Inspector of Police And Anr (Supreme Court of India)

Supreme Court held In the case of P. Satyanarayana Murthy V. The Dist. Inspector of Police and ANR that the proof of demand of illegal gratification is the gravamen of the offence under Sections 7 and 13(1) (d)(i)&(ii) of the Act and in absence thereof, unmistakably the charge there for, would fail....

Read More

No TDS liability arise on mere passing of book entry which gets reversed subsequently

Director of Income Tax Vs M/s Ericsson Communications Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Delhi High Court held In the case of DIT Vs. M/s Ericsson Communications Ltd. that mere passing of the book entries, which are reversed, would not give rise to an obligation to deduct TDS by the Assessee, as clearly, there is no debt that can be said to be acknowledged by the Assessee. ...

Read More

Search Posts by Date

October 2020