Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Archive: 14 September 2015

Posts in 14 September 2015

Postmortem of Union Budget 2024: A Comprehensive Webinar

July 18, 2024 4431 Views 3 comments Print

Join our webinar on July 24-25 for an in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2024. Learn about tax proposals, sector impacts, and investment insights. Register now!

Live Course on 360 degree Analysis of Input Tax Credit from a Litigation Perspective

July 18, 2024 3906 Views 0 comment Print

Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC complexities. Register now!

Performance Evaluation Of Board & Directors Including Independent Directors

September 14, 2015 54236 Views 0 comment Print

In the Board’s Report a statement has to be given indicating the manner in which formal annual evaluation has been made by the Board of its own performance and that of its committees and individual directors [Section 134 & Companies { Accounts} Rules 2014}].

Types of Leases and its Disclosure in Financial Statements

September 14, 2015 26866 Views 0 comment Print

Lease: is defined as a lease is an arrangement whereby the lessor conveys to lessee in return for a payment or series of payments the right to use an asset for an agreed period of time. In an agreement of Lease the Lessor and the Lessee enter into an arrangement in which lessor transfer right to use an asset to Lessee against a payment of Lease Rental for a period of time.

Private Placement Offer Letter

September 14, 2015 49402 Views 4 comments Print

PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFER LETTER UNDER SECTION 42 OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 AND RULE 14 OF PROSPECTUS AND ALLOTMENT OF SECURITIES CHAPTER III. Section 42 of Companies Act 2013 provides, companies shall make a private placement through issue of a private placement offer letter (PPOL).

Pre-deposit u/s 35F not applicable to stay applications &appeals pending prior to commencement of Finance Act (2 of 2014)- HC

September 14, 2015 829 Views 0 comment Print

In the case of Fifth Avenue Sourcing (P) Ltd. V/s Commissioner of Service Tax it was held BY Madras High Court that second proviso to Section 35F of the Act makes it abundantly clear that the proviso to this Section shall not apply to stay applications and appeals pending before the appellate authority prior to the commencement of the Finance Act (2 of 2014).

Depreciation on enhanced cost of asset is allowed from the date when the obligation to pay customs duty arose

September 14, 2015 3383 Views 0 comment Print

In the of CIT Vs. Noida Medicare Centre Ltd, Delhi High Court held that the AO erred in disallowing the capitalization of the additional customs duty in the manner claimed by the Assessee and adding the entire customs duty paid in the relevant AY to the income of the Assessee.

Comparable transactions/entity must be selected based on similarity with controlled transaction/entity

September 14, 2015 1522 Views 0 comment Print

In the case of Rampgreen Solutions Pvt Ltd vs CIT, Delhi High Court inter-alia held that the expression ‘BPO’ and ‘KPO’ are, plainly, understood in the sense that whereas, BPO does not necessarily involve advanced skills

High Courts, being Courts of Record, have the inherent power of review

September 14, 2015 2710 Views 0 comment Print

In the case of CIT vs M/s.Meghalaya Steels Ltd. the Supreme Court held that High Courts being Courts of Record under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, the power of review would in fact inhere in them.

Consignment wise duty payment can be made through CENVAT credit balance: SC

September 14, 2015 1537 Views 0 comment Print

In the case of M/s Jayaswal Neco Ltd. V/s Commissioner of Central Excise it was held by Supreme Court that even during the period when the facility of payment of excise duty in instalments on fortnightly basis is not available and remains suspended

Service tax cannot be levied on indivisible works contracts prior to 1st June, 2007: SC

September 14, 2015 2118 Views 0 comment Print

In the case of Commissioner, Central Excise & Customs, Kerala Vs. M/s Larsen & Toubro Ltd., it was held by Supreme Court that service tax cannot be levied on indivisible works contracts prior to introduction, on 1st June, 2007.

Mere addition in value after certain process does not amount to manufacture– SC

September 14, 2015 3663 Views 0 comment Print

In the case of M/s. Satnam Overseas Ltd. V/s. Commnr. of Central Excise it was held by Supreme Court that mere addition in the value after the original product has undergone certain process, would not bring it within the definition of ‘manufacture’ unless its original identity also under goes transformation and it becomes a distinctive and new product.

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031