Akash Sharma ♠ Companies Mandated to constitute a CSR Committee Networth of Rs 500 Crore or more Turnover of Rs 1000 Crore or more Net profit of Rs 5 Crore or more ♠ CSR Committee to have Three or more directors At least one is to be an independent director ♠ Board’s Report shall disclose […]
The case of the assessee is that they did not charge interest on that advance and in consideration of the same the assessee got the premises it a very low rent of rupees two per sq feet in a prime locality of Calcutta.
Punjab & Haryana High Court held In the case of CIT vs. Smt. Usha Saboo that although the agreement did not bifurcate the consideration towards the various covenants in the agreement, the assessee was entitled to bifurcate the same and apportion a part thereof towards the negative covenants.
We have considered the rival submissions carefully and perused the order of the AO and the CIT(A). In this case of the assessee original assessment was framed in scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act. Thereafter the completed assessment was sought to be reopened by the AO by issuance of the notice u/s 148 on the assessee on basis of reopening
Sub: Judgement dated 13th May, 2015 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in a Disciplinary matter The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in a landmark Judgment delivered on 13th May, 2015 in an appeal filed by a member of the Institute [Respondent in a disciplinary matter] and Others has upheld the Judgment given by […]
SLP proposals are to be sent in case adverse judgments relate to the following, irrespective of the amount involved: (a) Where the constitutional validity of the provisions of an Act or Rule is under challenge; and (b) Where Notification/Instruction/Order or Circular has been held to be illegal or ultra vires.
Annam Software Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT (ITAT Chennai) Assesse, an EOU, filed its return claiming exemption u/s 10 B. A.O. rejected assesse’s claim. In appellate proceedings , assesse raised a plea that in relevant year it had claimed deduction u/s 10 A
Provided that the requirements of this clause shall not apply if the funds managed are of Category I foreign portfolio investors and/or Category II foreign portfolio investors which are appropriately regulated broad based funds, as specified in Securities and Exchange Board of India (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2014.
Three Years Imprisonment with Fine of Rs. One Lakh to Then Commissioner of Income Tax and Two Years Imprisonment with Fine of Rs. 50,000/- To His Wife in a Disproportionate Assets Case The Special Judge for CBI cases, Mumbai (Maharashtra) has convicted Shri Ashok Kumar Purwar, then Commissioner of Income Tax (an IRS Officer of […]
CIRCULAR NO.10 of 2015-16 I, Sanjeev Khirwar, Commissioner, Value Added Tax, do hereby extend the last date of filing of online/hard copy of fourth quarter return for the year 2014-15, in Form DVAT-16, DVAT-17 and DVAT-48 along with required annexures /enclosures to 22/05/2015
