SEBI Chairman urges Industry to understand the intention behind new disclosure and governance norms / Its time Industry takes steps to strengthen Capital Markets: U K Sinha, Chairman, SEBI “Corporates should run their own Pension Funds for their non-EPFO category employees and invest funds in the equity market”, urged Mr U K Sinha, Chairman, Securities […]
Until a date is notified by the Central Government under sub-section (1) of Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Company Law Board constituted in pursuance of sub-section (1) of Section 10E of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) shall exercise the jurisdiction, powers, authority and functions of the Tribunal under sub-section (2) of Section 74 of the said Act.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby appoints the 6th day of June, 2014 as the date on which the provisions of sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 74 of the said Act shall come into force.
In view of the suggestions received from the stakeholders to give transitional period for complying with the deposit insurance requirements, the amendment in the relevant rule has been made allowing companies to accept deposits without deposit insurance for one year i.e. till 31.03.2015.
Notification No. 30/2014-Income Tax Whereas, an agreement (hereinafter referred to as the said agreement) between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the Principality of Liechtenstein, for the exchange of information on tax matters was signed at Berne, Switzerland on the 28th day of March, 2013
The assessing officer is a prospector of the revenue and he is no doubt expected to protect the interests of the revenue zealously, but such zeal has to be tempered with the rules of fair play and an anxiety to ensure that a opportunity is not lost to the assessee to make alternative arrangements for clearing the tax dues, once the stay applications filed under section 220(3) are rejected.
The amendment brought in by the Finance Act with retrospective effect, which was passed in the year subsequent to the year under consideration, should not be considered for penalizing the assessee by way of disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act.
We are uploading herewith a chart showing provisions relating to disclosure of interest by directors and Key Managerial Persons (KMPs) under section 184(1), 184(2), 189(2) of Companies Act, 2013 read with Rules 9 & 16 of Chapter XII – The Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014 at a glance which could be useful to all.
The section 185 of Companies Act,2013 was notified on 12th September 2013 and was applicable from that day itself. If there is any deviation from the conditions laid under this section then the Auditor is required to report the same in his Audit Report. A non qualified report would hold auditor in default.
There is a general conception that if subsidiary co do not utilize loan given by its holding co for its principal business, provisions of sec 185 is attracted each & every time. In other words, if loan given or guarantee given or security provided by holding co to its subsidiary is not exempted by the Rule 10 of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, Sec 185 is violated.
