Join our free webinar on July 4th at 4:00 PM to gain insights into the dematerialization of securities and recent amendments. Register now for key updates.
Join our free webinar on July 7 at 5 PM for insights into 10 recent High Court income tax judgments favoring assessees. Expert analysis by CA Dipak Dama.
Facts apropos are that assessee, a firm of Chartered Accountants, filed its return for impugned assessment year on 30th September, 2008, declaring a total income of ~ 17,70,69,972/-. The assessment was completed on 31st December, 2010 under Section 143(3) of the Act
Contention of the Assessee :- The alleged Pen drive is not an admissible evidence, therefore the recording of reasons and consequent 148 proceedings based on the reasons of such unreliable evidence are bad in law.
The Special Judge for CBI cases, Mumbai has convicted Smt. Kirti Rajesh Singh, then Senior Tax Assistant and Shri Rajesh Harbans Singh, then Tax Assistant of Customs(Preventive), Mumbai and sentenced them to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment with total fine of Rs.20,500/- in a bribery case.
Validity of IEC for Export Oriented Unit (EOU) or units in Special Economic Zone/Electronics Hardware Technology Park(EHTP)/Software Technology Park(STP)/Bio-Technology Park(BTP) after de-bonding: Review of Policy Circular 26/ dated 11.8.2008.
The result of the Chartered Accountants Intermediate (IPC) Examinations held in May,2013 are likely to be declared on Wednesday, the 31st July, 2013 around 4.00 P.M. and the same as well as the merit list (candidates securing a minimum of 55% and above marks and upto the maximum of 50th Rank on all India basis will be available on the following website:
As part of its ongoing initiative, the Income Tax Department has, on 22nd July, 2013 sent letters to another batch of 35,000 non filers. These persons were part of the around 12 lakh non-filers identified as a result of data matching exercise. With this latest batch, the Department has now issued letters in 2,10,000 high priority cases.
Issue – Whether in the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was right in holding that the wrong claim made by the assessee is not filing of inaccurate particulars, ignoring the fact that the assessee has knowingly claimed the setting off of loss against other source
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following amendments in
