Follow Us:

Archive: December, 2010

Posts in December, 2010

Collusion between Bank Officials and Builders – SARFAESI Act – a Case Study

December 19, 2010 4078 Views 0 comment Print

I strongly believe that implementing the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 making a good balance between the object and the interests of the borrower is a very complicated exercise. There are so many judgments on the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and still certain areas remain complicated. I would like to share a typical case presented to me in the recent past and the facts of the case are as follows:

For Debate – Change In CST Act?

December 19, 2010 825 Views 0 comment Print

We aim to be an efficient and effective tax administration respected for fairness, transparency and professionalism.” If a registered dealer/company is not issuing form C, even though the same is mentioned in their purchase order, the invoices are raised accordingly, Sale tax dept collects additional tax, penalty from the Seller & the Buyer is not penalized? No questions are asked to the Buyer for non issuing of Form C, against applicable purchases! Sale tax dept allows Buyer to continue the business, and indirectly helping him to evade the tax?

Dividend on shares held by assessee as stock-in-trade is taxable as Business Income

December 19, 2010 9865 Views 0 comment Print

Swatanter Kumar J.- Before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, the Income-tax Officer, Ward-II New Delhi, while preferring an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) dated December 1, 1999, relating to the assessing year 1996-97, raised the following issue

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs D.G. Goenka – Bombay High Court

December 19, 2010 814 Views 0 comment Print

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the dividend received by the assessee on the shares held by him as stock-in-trade of his share business was earned income ?

Can a borrower dispute the outstanding due under section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002?

December 18, 2010 1491 Views 0 comment Print

We all aware of the object behind SARFAESI Act, 2002 and it is to enable the banks to recover the debts speedily and to enable the banks to reduce NPAs. Despite lot of criticism that SARFAESI Act, 2002 is draconian law and it enables the Banks to harass the borrowers, Banks suffer to recover their dues in the absence of a special legislation like SARFAESI Act, 2002.

FAQ on Service Tax on receipt of services from outside India [Import of services]

December 18, 2010 1322 Views 0 comment Print

Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994, inserted with effect from 18.4.2006, provides that where any taxable service is provided or to be provided by a person who has established a business or has a fixed establishment from which the service is provide

FAQ on Export of Services and taxable service used in relation to export of goods

December 18, 2010 3280 Views 0 comment Print

What is Export of Services? Whether export of services is exempted from Service Tax? What constitute export of service is defined in the Export of Service Rules, 2005. The export of taxable services is exempted from Service Tax.

Section 195- Deductibility of Tax on disputed Payment

December 18, 2010 933 Views 0 comment Print

the assessee-company had made various payments to its holding company M/s. Alstom Holdings, France but no deductions of tax at source were made. – there is justification for the assessee’s conviction at the time of payment that no tax was deductible at source. It was neither a composite payment.

Interest on fixed deposit made for business purpose should be considered as business income and not as income from other sources

December 18, 2010 12588 Views 0 comment Print

Mumbai bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) held that interest income earned on fixed deposit made for the purpose of business should be considered as business income and not as income from other sources. Further, the Tribunal held that salary and welfare expenses of taxpayer’s staff will not be covered under section 44C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) since the expenses are directly related to the Indian Project. The Tribunal also held that the payment made for procurement services cannot be considered to be a payment towards fees for technical services as per India-Korea Tax Treaty (the tax treaty) since procurement services were purely commercial in nature and had nothing to do with rendering of any technical managerial or consultancy services.

Captive service provider cannot be compared with Infosys Technologies Limited- Delhi ITAT

December 18, 2010 856 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Delhi held that a captive service provider assuming minimal risks, cannot be compared to a large company like Infosys Technologies Limited which assumes all risks leading to greater rewards.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930