(ii) The Principal notification No.46/2002-Customs, dated the 22nd April, 2002 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-Section (1) vide number G.S.R 299(E), dated the 22 nd April, 2002 and was last amended by notification No.63/2008-Customs, dated the 8th May, 2008 was published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-Section (i) vide number G.S.R 346 (E), dated 8 th May, 2008.
Notification No. 8/2009-ST In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994) (hereinafter referred to as the Finance Act), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts all the taxable services specified in sub-section 105 of section 65 of the Finance Act from so much of service tax leviable there on under section 66 of the Finance Act, as is in excess of the rate of ten per cent of the value of taxable services.
The principal notification No. 52/2003-Customs, dated the 31st March, 2003 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub section (i) vide number G.S.R 274(E), dated the 31st March, 2003 and last amended by notification No. 60/2008-Customs, dated the 5th May, 2008 published vide number G.S.R. 334 (E), dated the 5th May, 2008.
G.S.R. 110 (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), read with sub-section (3) of section 3 of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 (58 of 1957) and sub-section (3) of section 3 of Additional Duties of Excise.
Circular No. 9/2009-Customs F. No. 401 /148/2008-Cus-III Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs New Delhi dated the 23rd February , 2009 To All Chief Commissioners of Customs / Customs (Prev.). All Chief Commissioners of Customs & Central Excise. All Commissioners of Customs / Customs (Prev.). All […]
7. Rival submissions of the parties have been considered carefully. The question for our consideration is whether the income accruing to the assessee should be assessed as `business income’ as claimed by the assessee or partly as `income from house property’ and partly as `income from other sources’ as held by the Assessing Officer Officer. At the outset, we may mention that the Assessing Officer has committed
Government orders inspections under Sec. 209A of the Companies Act, 1956 of the books of accounts of companies selected on account of complaints or other information relating to non-compliance with or violation of the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 or other irregularities. Suitable action under the law is taken in case any non-compliance/ violation […]
11. I have carefully considered the rival contentions and gone through the impugned orders. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Pullangode Rubber Produce Co. Ltd. v. State of Kerala (1973) 91 ITR 18 (SC) has clearly held that an admission by the assessee is not conclusive evidence and it is always open to the assessee who made the submission to show that it is incorrect.
Gopal Purohit v. JCIT- The delivery based transaction should be treated as of the nature of investment transactions and profit there from should be treated as short-term capital gain or long term capital gain depending upon the period of holding; employment of an infrastructure so as to keep a track of the developments in the share market cannot turn an investment activity into a business activity.
The Council at its Meeting held on 18-20 December, 2008 approved the thoroughly revised 11th Edition of Code of Ethics 2009. The new Code of Ethics has been released on 4th February, 2009 by the Hon’ble Minister of Corporate Affairs, Govt. of India on the occasion of 59th Annual Function of the Institute. The New […]
