Commission has no jurisdiction to hand over the possession of plot in question to the complainant; that is the task of the Civil Court. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the closest term has restrained to this Commission from assuming the power of the Civil Court. It is also clarified in the paragraph that this Court cannot grant any specific performance.
There cannot be any dispute that Karanataka High Court has specifically held that the provisions of the MRTP Act were not and could not be applicable to the educational institutions. There is no dispute that the present complaint also pertains to the educational institution and its activity of imparting education.
Sub-rule (1) of Rule 67 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 and Rule 4 of the Central Sales Tax(Delhi) Rules, 2005 for furnishing of reconciliation return in Form DVAT-51; and,
It is reiterated that action in instances of violation of discipline and conduct rules would be taken in accordance with the instructions on the subject.
CBEC has requested the Chief Commissioners of Central Excise & Customs to keep their offices open on 29th, 30th and 31st March and also to issue Trade Notices for the information of the Trade as it feels bulk of the Revenue is received at the end of the month.
The lower authority had also held that the refund claim is partially time-barred. The appellant had argued that the refund claim is not hit by limitation inasmuch as the time prescribed under Section 11B is applicable only to those tax which is collected as permitted by the statute and in the instant case the tax was collected without authority of law and hence time limit is not applicable.
Advocates/Chartered Accountant/Authorized Representative and assessees are hereby informed that in case of E-Payment of Tribunal Fees the respective Challans are to be counter signed by the concerned bank manager or attested by the authorized Representatives or assessees themselves
Provided further that notwithstanding anything contained in regulation 7, it shall be lawful for the Chairman to inter-se transfer any matter pending before a Regional Bench to any other Regional Bench or to the Principal Bench either at the joint request of the parties or for other reasons to be recorded in writing
Order [F. No. 52/26/CAB-2010], Dated 6-11-2012 – Consequent upon notification of the Product or Activity Group classification published vide S.O. 1747(E) dated 7th August, 2012 and in supersession of the earlier Orders issued vide even number dated 2nd May 2011, 3rd May 2011, 30th June 2011 and 24th January 2012, the Central Government hereby makes the following Order.
ORDER NO. 194 OF 2012, Dated 18th October 2012 39399 The transfers/postings of officers in the grade of Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax are hereby ordered with immediate effect and until further orders:
