In re Innovations Medi research Private Limited (AAR Rajasthan) AAR Rajasthan addresses two key questions regarding the composite supply of medicines and procedures for inpatients in hospitals. Firstly, it determines whether such supply qualifies as a composite supply. The ruling confirms that it does, considering the nature of various services bundled in the ordinary course […]
AAR held that substance use disorder (SUD) is out of ambit of health care services and supply of services by treatment of patients suffering from SUD as out-patient don’t fall under the definition of health care services so not exempt under entry 74(a) of notification no. 12/2017 CGST Rate dated 28-06-2017.
ITAT Delhi held that as per amendment to section 153C of the Income Tax Act the six assessment years immediately preceding the AY relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted or requisition is made will come into the purview of block assessment years.
CESTAT Kolkata held that suspension of Customs Broker license at the stage of Show Cause Notice unjustified as the same will have serious implication on the livelihood of many employees working in the organization.
ITAT Hyderabad held that for the purpose of claiming deduction u/s 54F of the Act, it is essential for the assessee to prove that she does not have more than a residential house at the time of claiming deduction u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Jaipur held that officers of DRI are not proper officers for the purposes of Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 and hence order and show cause notice are not maintainable. Accordingly, addition confirmed thereon is unsustainable.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that the export entitlements is an income assessable under the head profits or gains from business or profession as per clause (iiib) and (iiid) to section 28 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Explore the Gujarat High Court judgment on GST registration cancellation revocation. Notification No. 3/2023 benefits Allyssum Infra in challenging the order.
CIT (A) on the basis of certain documents filed by assessee deleted addition without calling for any remand report from AO or without giving any opportunity to AAO to verify documents.
CESTAT find that Appellant claims that most of demands have been raised under the wrong category of services hence not sustainable.
