Vivek Saxena Vs Ashish Verma, Chief Income Tax (Allahabad High court) The present contempt application has been filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for punishing the Opposite Party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 01.12.2022 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 16848 of 2022. It is […]
No adjustment on account of a different assessable value adopted at Pipavav Port cannot be made in the refund amount as the import and clearance made at Pipavav Port is an independent clearance made by different Assessing Officers.
Assessee is an illiterate farmer and claims that he was not properly presented in assessment and appellate proceedings. Moreover, assessee claims that he was misguided by consultant
Read about Ansal Properties vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) case. Penalty not sustainable on QIP and 80-IB disallowance. Full text of ITAT Delhi order
The charge of under valuation cannot be established without challenging the assessment made by the assessing group as per the procedure prescribed. It is not the case where the goods where being cleared on the basis of the declared value but were being cleared on the basis of the assessed value on the payment of assessed duty.
Assessee tried to recover forfeited money and when all efforts to recover forfeited money went in vain the same been claimed as expenditure
Having regard to the genesis of the dispute as well as the issue as to whether the appellant is likely to flee from justice if he were to be permitted to travel to the US, we find, on the basis of the previous record of the appellant, that there is no reason or justification to deny him the permission which has been sought to travel to the US for eight weeks.
Satish Chandra Verma Vs Union of India (Supreme Court of India) In the instant case, the appellant who is a member of the All India Services has paid leave to his credit and has applied to go to U.S.A. and France to visit members of his family who are residing there. On an earlier occasion […]
There was no condition to furnish passport in order dated 15th January, 2020. He has furnished documents about business trip to Dubai. It is pertinent to note that the order granting anticipatory bail is challenged before this Court.
Supreme Court decision in Anatbhai Shah Vs State of Gujarat. Condition to deposit Rs.2 crores set aside. Learn about the ruling’s impact.
