Discover the intricacies of the ITAT Pune’s recent decision in Vashi Parivaar Foundation Vs Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemptions), highlighting the importance of proving the genuineness of charitable activities for gaining tax exemption.
ITAT Delhi held that the revenue itself is not very sure of the receipt of the cash nor there was any evidence. Accordingly, addition based on baseless allegation which cannot be proved is unsustainable.
ITAT Pune held that the deduction u/s 36(1)(va) in respect of employee’s contribution not entitled on failure to deposit employee’s contribution before due date prescribed under the relevant statutes.
ITAT Surat held that assessee is not required to get his books of accounts audited under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act as capital gain, short term or long term, doesn’t form part of turnover. Accordingly, penalty under section 271B not leviable.
ITAT Amritsar held that in case of non-cooperation during conduct of special audit under section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act, the time limit to do the same can be extended at the end of the department.
Read the full text of the judgment/order of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Winsome Highrise Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. The court quashes the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for violating principles of natural justice by denying the petitioner an opportunity for a personal hearing.
Delve into the case of Society of Educational Assistance and Training Vs CIT (Exemptions), where ITAT Amritsar mandates reconsideration of a charitable trust registration rejection due to a lack of fair hearing opportunity.
Explore CESTAT Mumbai judgement in Astoria Agro & Allied Inds Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST, underlining importance of evidence consideration in rejecting Cenvat Credit claims
CESTAT held that the utilization of credit by any unit within the same entity would not cause any loss to the Exchequer. This is because the credit disallowed to one unit is proportionally made available to the second unit. From a company’s perspective, the net credit availed and utilized remains unchanged.
Delve into judgment of CESTAT Kolkata in the case of Pecon Computech Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST & Excise, underlining non-applicability of unjust enrichment in context of Service Tax refunds
