Read how Posco India successfully secured a refund of wrongly paid anti-dumping duty in a case against C.C.-Kandla, as decided by CESTAT Ahmedabad. Learn about the legal implications.
In this article, we discuss ITAT Mumbai’s decision in Hiranandani Healthcare Pvt Ltd vs CIT case regarding set-off of brought forward losses and impact of Section 79 on individual shareholding changes.
Calcutta High Court’s decision on GST tax liability for government contracts, both pre-GST and post-GST. Learn about relief and representation.
Explore Calcutta High Court’s interim ruling addressing GST tax liability for government contracts and its impact on ongoing projects. Learn more
CESTAT Kolkata directs re-adjudication of a live consignment pending without justiciable reasons. Full text of the CESTAT order regarding M/s IB Turbo Pvt. Ltd.
Classification ruling for Nickel Hydroxide Compound containing 92% to 100% Nickel Hydroxide, Cobalt Hydroxide, and Sodium Sulphate by CAAR Mumbai
ITAT Mumbai held that the levy of penalty under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act is not mandatory or automatic and same needs to be examined depending upon the facts and circumstances of the case.
In present facts of the case, the NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI (NCDRC) have held that suppression of facts would be tenable if there is direct relationship between disease which has been concealed and the death of the Insured.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that Department has brought nothing on record to prove that the assessee was involved in price rigging of the instant share or that any form of cash had flown back to the assessee. Accordingly, addition on account of bogus capital gain by sale of shares unjustified.
CESTAT Chennai held that non-payment of tax merely on the basis of bald statement of financial constraint without proving the same is not reasonable cause within the meaning of section 80 of the Finance Act. Accordingly, demand confirmed.
