The Patna High Court, in the case of Punit Kumar Choubey vs Commissioner, holds that Article 226 cannot be invoked when the statutory remedy of appeal is not availed. Explore the details of the judgment and its implications.
Delhi High Court held that the notice under Section 274 of the Income Tax Act should have been issued before the period of limitation as prescribed under section 275(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.
FedEx Express Transportation and Supply Chain Services (India) Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The case of FedEx Express Transportation and Supply Chain Services (India) Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) revolves around the validity of a Transfer Pricing order, draft assessment order, and the consequent final assessment order. The key contention is whether the […]
In a recent judgment, the Madras High Court permitted a 60% depreciation rate on computer software licenses, emphasizing the specific entry in the tax laws and clarifying the treatment of non-compete fees as revenue expenditure.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act rightly deleted by CIT(A) as documentary evidences proving identity, creditworthiness of the parties and genuineness of the transaction were not proved to be defective by revenue.
CESTAT Kolkata held that provisions of rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 is not applicable when CENVAT Credit attributable to non-excisable goods not availed. Accordingly, demand set aside.
ITAT Pune restored the matter back to the file of AO for examining the claim of Foreign Tax Credit of the assessee vis-à-vis furnishing of the Certificate or Statement as per Rule 128(8)(ii) along with Form No. 67.
Delhi High Court held that it is settled legal position that re-assessment proceedings under section 148 of the Income Tax Act cannot be triggered on the aspects which AO has already formed an opinion. Accordingly, notice issued u/s 148 set aside.
ITAT Mumbai decision in Hari Mittar Yadav vs. ITO: Confirmation of addition on LTCG under Section 50C based on unregistered deeds entered on judicial stamp papers.
Genxt Mobile LLP wins appeal as ITAT deletes disallowance on interest payment, citing failure to compare with the fair market value under Section 40A(2)(a).
