CESTAT Kolkata’s decision to uphold the enhanced value of customs duty on a multi-function printer based on a chartered engineer’s estimation.
Kerala High Court directs deposit of 20% disputed tax to suspend revenue recovery in VAT appeal. Get insights into the court’s decision in this article.
Delhi High Court grants a review petition challenging the handling of a petitioner’s document request by the Customs Commissioner. Learn more in this article.
Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Delhi’s decision to dismiss a reopening based on a change of opinion in the case of ITO Vs Sant Singh.
Merely because the loan processing charges though paid upfront but amortized over a period of five years, solely to be in consonance with the mercantile system of accounting, deduction of the entire charges in lump sum in the year in which the same were paid could not be denied to assessee.
ITAT Delhi held that assessment framed u/s. 153A of the Income Tax Act based on material found during search on third party without following the mandate of section 153C of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable in law.
Kerala High Court held that as petitioner failed to reply to the show cause notice and failed to attend the hearing. Thus, petitioner chose not to provide any evidence in respect of his claim of input tax credit. Hence, writ not entertained.
CESTAT Kolkata held that benefit of preferential rate vide Notification 53/2011-Cus dated 01.07.2011 not deniable as Certificate of country of origin from Malysia Chamber of Commerce for subsequent import of identical goods afterward submitted.
Andhra Pradesh High Court allows a writ petition and condones the delay in filing a GST appeal, offering relief to the petitioner.
The Patna High Court, in the case of Punit Kumar Choubey vs Commissioner, holds that Article 226 cannot be invoked when the statutory remedy of appeal is not availed. Explore the details of the judgment and its implications.
