Delhi High Court ruled that the period spent in disposal of appeal before CESTAT shall not count towards period stipulated under Section 28(9) of Customs Act.
Madras High Court overturns GST revision order, granting Renault Nissan a chance for fair hearing on their substantial ITC refund claim. Read for detailed insights.
Bombay High Court grants provisional release of premium cold coffee, criticizes discriminatory treatment by Customs, directs acceptance of bank guarantee.
Allahabad High Court clarifies that under the UPVAT Act, High Court’s revision jurisdiction is limited to questions of law, jurisdictional errors, or procedural irregularities.
Read how CESTAT Chandigarh directs release of seized imported garlic on furnishing bond and bank guarantee covering the demand of differential duty. Legal analysis and implications provided.
Read how Allahabad High Court’s order directs depositing 20% of disputed tax under CGST Act, halting recovery proceedings. Insights into legal implications and proceedings.
CESTAT ruling favors Samarth Corporation, negating Customs’ demand for interest and penalties over bond non-furnishing under amended notification.
Learn from Allahabad High Court’s ruling that while res judicata doesn’t apply in tax matters, the doctrine of finality prevails unless there’s a marked change.
CESTAT Kolkata rules in favor of UCO Bank, allowing Cenvat credit for service tax paid on telephone bills for employee residences. Details of the case here.
Learn about the Calcutta High Court’s decision regarding the applicability of the Limitation Act in filing GST appeals. Detailed analysis and implications discussed.
