GST registration was cancelled for non-filing of returns for six months and appeal was time-barred. The court permitted filing of a physical revocation application and directed time-bound disposal.
GST registration was cancelled for non-filing of returns, but the court permitted manual filing of revocation due to hardship. Authorities were directed to consider the application within a fixed timeline.
The issue involved GST registration cancellation due to non-filing of returns and a delayed appeal. The court allowed manual filing of a revocation application and directed authorities to decide it within a fixed timeframe.
The issue involved GST registration cancellation for non-filing of returns and inability to apply online due to time limits. The court allowed manual filing of revocation and directed authorities to decide it within a fixed timeframe.
The court addressed cancellation of GST registration due to non-filing of returns and procedural delays. It allowed the taxpayer to submit a manual revocation application, directing authorities to decide it on merits within a fixed timeline.
The Tribunal held that rejection of declared value without proof of inaccuracy was unjustified. Key takeaway: transaction value cannot be rejected without reasonable doubt and supporting evidence.
The issue involved additions based on alleged bogus purchases without VAT payment. The Tribunal remanded the matter pending the High Court’s decision on similar cases.
The Tribunal upheld TDS liability where tax was deducted only on part of the property value. It ruled that TDS must be applied on the entire consideration for immovable property transactions.
The issue involved denial of ITC without evaluating submitted documents. The Court directed authorities to reconsider objections with evidence of genuine transactions. The key takeaway is that authorities must examine taxpayer replies before issuing final decisions.
The issue involved alleged cyber fraud where funds were credited to the petitioner’s account. The Court granted relief considering absence of criminal history and willingness to return the money.
