Telangana High Court held that the taxpayer may seek rectification under Section 161 of the CGST Act where allegations of overlapping GST proceedings arise for the same tax period. The Court directed authorities to consider the rectification application after granting hearing opportunity.
Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to file an appeal against the GST assessment order along with a delay condonation application. The Court directed the appellate authority to sympathetically consider the delay since the taxpayer had been pursuing writ proceedings.
Telangana High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging DGGI summons after the department agreed to issue fresh summons with sufficient response time. The Court held that the challenge to the earlier summons had become academic since it was no longer being acted upon.
Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to file a delayed appeal against the GST assessment order along with a delay condonation application. The Court directed the appellate authority to consider the delay sympathetically since the taxpayer had pursued writ proceedings.
Mumbai ITAT held that additions for alleged accommodation entries and commission income cannot be sustained solely on retracted statements and third-party Tally data without independent corroborative evidence.
Bombay High Court held that GST registration cannot be cancelled without proper hearing and a reasoned order. The Court quashed the cancellation and revocation rejection orders for violating principles of natural justice.
Bombay High Court held that delay in filing Form No. 10 for claiming accumulation under Section 11(2) should be condoned where genuine hardship exists. The Court adopted a liberal and justice-oriented approach to protect charitable exemption claims.
The ITAT Amritsar reduced additions on unexplained cash deposits after considering that the assessee and his wife were senior citizens with no regular income source. The Tribunal allowed part of the deposits as past savings and household cash availability.
The ITAT Amritsar remanded a case involving denial of section 54B exemption where the assessee relied on Girdawari records to prove agricultural use of land. The Tribunal directed fresh verification of land records after finding disputes regarding cultivation entries in revenue documents.
The Mumbai ITAT held that additions under Section 69 cannot be sustained merely on the basis of uncorroborated excel-sheet entries and third-party statements. The Tribunal deleted the alleged on-money addition in the Rubberwala Group matter.
