Follow Us:

Judiciary

ITAT Allows Interest Deduction as Overseas Acquisition Held for Business Expansion

March 20, 2026 522 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that interest on borrowed funds used to acquire a foreign company in the same line of business is allowable under Section 36(1)(iii). It found that the acquisition was driven by commercial expediency and business expansion. 

CESTAT Orders Reconsideration of Excise Duty on Barbed Wire Due to Incomplete Findings

March 20, 2026 321 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that whether conversion of GI wire into barbed wire and mesh amounts to manufacture requires fresh evaluation. It set aside earlier orders due to incomplete analysis. The case was remanded for re-examination of all issues.

CESTAT Allows Post-Manufacturing Deductions, Quashes Excise Demand on Dabur India

March 20, 2026 282 Views 0 comment Print

The issue was whether post-manufacturing expense deductions on a weighted average basis are admissible. The Tribunal held that earlier rulings in the same case had settled the issue, leading to cancellation of demand and penalties.

Jewellery Release Ordered as Delay Violated CBDT Timelines & Increased Burden Unjustified

March 20, 2026 495 Views 0 comment Print

The Court held that administrative delay in releasing seized jewellery violated CBDT-prescribed timelines. It ruled that increased bank guarantee due to rising gold prices cannot be imposed on the taxpayer.

Service Tax Not Payable Due to Cost-Sharing Without Service Element in Advertisement Expenses: CESTAT Chennai

March 20, 2026 294 Views 0 comment Print

Issue was whether reimbursement of advertisement expenses constitutes taxable service under BAS. Tribunal held that cost-sharing without a service provider–recipient relationship is not taxable and set aside demand.

Sales Promotion by Foreign Branch Falls Under BAS but Not Taxable Under RCM: CESTAT Bangalore

March 20, 2026 234 Views 0 comment Print

Tribunal held that builders were not liable to service tax before 01.07.2010 based on statutory provisions and Board circulars. It set aside demand for disputed period accordingly.

Intimation Requirement Under Rule 6(3A) Is Procedural, Not Mandatory: CESTAT Ahmedabad

March 20, 2026 159 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that failure to intimate the Superintendent under Rule 6(3A) does not invalidate proportionate credit reversal. It clarified that such intimation is procedural and not a substantive condition.

Clerical Mistakes in GST Returns Not a Valid Reason to Deny Export Refunds: SC

March 20, 2026 2952 Views 0 comment Print

The SC declined to interfere with the High Courts order granting IGST refund despite return filing error. It upheld that refund cannot be denied when export and tax payment are undisputed.

Gujarat HC Allowed IGST Refund Despite GSTR-1 Error as Export & Payment Proven

March 20, 2026 594 Views 0 comment Print

The Court held that refund cannot be denied due to clerical errors in GST returns when export and IGST payment are undisputed. It directed refund with interest under Rule 96.

Goods Without E-Way Bill & Invoice from Suspended Supplier Justify Detention and Penalty

March 20, 2026 1305 Views 0 comment Print

The High Court held that goods transported without an e-way bill and supported by an invalid invoice from a suspended supplier cannot be released. The absence of valid documents justified detention and penalty.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031