CESTAT Ahmedabad held that duty was paid on the clearance value on which demand was raised. Accordingly as duty was paid demand under rule 6(3)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 unsustainable.
In re SATS Food Solutions India Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) The applicant is engaged in the business of manufacture/production and supply of frozen food in institutional packs to companies in Aviation Industries, quick service restaurants, Hotels etc., across Ready To Eat (RTE)/ Ready To Cook (RTC)/ Processed and Semi Processed categories. The applicant has sought […]
In re Ess Ess Kay Engineering Company Pvt (GST AAAR Punjab) Appellate Authority uphold the order AAR/GST/PB/016 dated 16th of August, 2022 issued by the Authority for Advance Ruling, Punjab and the appeal filed by the appellant M/s ESS ESS KAY ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT LTD. The appellant has conveniently overlooked the basic nature of the […]
Revenue Department had neither sought any new information nor made a reference to new material on record. Held that, a change in opinion that does not satisfy the jurisdictional foundation under Section 147 of the IT Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition towards unexplained cash unsustainable as cash expenses duly incorporated in books of accounts and cash book as well as cash receipts not doubted by the authority.
Bombay High Court held that issue of reopening of assessment has to be tested only on the basis of the reasons recorded, which reasons can neither be improved upon nor substituted by an affidavit or oral submissions.
Read the analysis and conclusion of the GST Advance Ruling (AAR) on the HSN classification and applicable tax rate for Fortified Rice Kernels (FRK) supplied by Brindavan Agrotech Private Limited.
In re NBCC (India) Limited (GST AAAR Delhi) Whether or not MoHUA, Government of India, is liable to pay GST on the sale of commercial built-up space? The appellant has contested that the construction activities and sale thereof are exempted from tax under Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) being in relation to a function […]
Delhi High Court held that failure on the part of Objection Hearing Authority (OHA) to pass an order doesn’t automatically result in allowing refund u/s. 42(1) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004.
Delhi High Court held that non-scheduled (passenger services) as defined under clause (b) of explanation to Condition no. 104 of notification no. 21/2022-CUS as amended by notification no. 61/2007-CUS doesn-t include providing air transport services to public at large on payment of published tariff.
