My Home Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Tax Officer (Medras High court) The main ground on which order dated 14.05.2020 passed in terms of the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (in short ‘TNGST Act’) is assailed is that no pre-assessment notice/show cause notice was issued prior to passing of […]
The issue on merit that whether the service of construction of complex provided by the appellant’s cooperative housing society to its members is eligible to service tax or otherwise has been settled in favour of the appellant. It was informed by the learned counsel that the Hon’ble High Court’s judgment (supra) has been accepted by the revenue.
ACIT Vs Mahavir Infracon Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Raipur) Admittedly, it is a matter of fact borne from record that the assessee company which is engaged in the business as that of a developer, had in order to promote its sales incurred expenses towards stamp duty and registration fees with respect to the properties sold by […]
Supreme Court held that conviction based on statement of single person without recovery of any incriminating documents/ articles during search is unjustified. Non-recovery during search obviously benefits the appellant.
Gujarat High Court held that in respect of the proceedings where the first proviso to Section 149(1)(b) is attracted, the benefit of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation And Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA 2020) will not be available to the revenue.
ITAT Delhi held that co-ordinate bench in assessee’s own case in earlier assessment years duly hold that Huawei India is permanent establishment of Huawei China in India. Based on norms of judicial discipline the same is implied in the present assessment too.
H.C. Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Excise & CGST Alwar (CESTAT Delhi) As regards the second submission regarding the certificate dated March 31, 2010 issued by the Regional Manager, RIICO, a perusal of the said certificate would show that it was issued by the Regional Manager RIICO in connection with the commercial plot allotted […]
Calcutta High Court held that Tribunal duly examined the terms and conditions of the agreement and found that warranty clause is in-built. Accordingly, provision of warranty is duly allowable.
Delhi High Court held that procedure prescribed under rule 7 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 is to be followed for any party (including the person who participated in the anti-dumping investigation) requires any information. Rule 7 procedure cannot be bypassed by resorting to RTI.
Dharmendra M. Jani Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) HC held that provisions of Section 13(8)(b) and Section 8(2) of the IGST Act are legal, valid and constitutional, provided that the provisions of Section 13(8)(b) and Section 8(2) are confined in their operation to the provisions of IGST Act only and the same cannot […]
