Income Tax Tax Deductions related News, Article, Notification, Judgments covering all section Including Section 80C, 80D, 80TTA, 80HHC, 80JJA
Income Tax : Explore Section 80JJAA of Income Tax Act, encouraging job creation in India. Learn about conditions, deductions, and benefits for ...
Income Tax : Learn about TDS on property purchase under Section 194IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Get insights on requirements, payment proces...
Income Tax : Discover everything about Income Tax Deduction under Section 80C - eligibility, qualifying investments, maximum deduction, and mor...
Income Tax : Learn about Deduction u/s 80JJAA: Who's eligible, how much is allowed, and what it means for additional employee costs. Expert ins...
Income Tax : Explore the worthiness of investing in NPS under Section 80CCD deduction for salary individuals/HUFs. Learn about tax benefits, re...
Corporate Law : Finance Bill 2024 updates Section 80G to reflect "National Sports Development Fund" and changes approval procedures for charities....
Income Tax : Learn about the amended provisions allowing non-government employers to deduct up to 14% of employee salaries for pension scheme ...
Income Tax : Section 35AC of the Income Tax Act, as amended by the Finance Act, 2016, provides that no deduction under this section shall be al...
Income Tax : Press Information Bureau Government of India Ministry of Finance 26-November-2015 09:44 IST Date for sending comments by the stake...
Income Tax : ne of the pillars of the of the taxation proposals included in the Finance Minister’s budget speech for 2015-16 was extension of...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court allows income tax deduction for payment clearing mortgage, dismissing Revenue’s appeal under section 263. Ful...
Income Tax : Read the detailed analysis of Laxminarayana Suvarna Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) on the eligibility of...
Income Tax : Detailed analysis of Alubound Dacs India Private Limited vs. DCIT case before ITAT Mumbai regarding the allowance of Section 80G d...
Income Tax : In Purnasons Pvt. Ltd vs. ITO, ITAT Kolkata rules on the allowance of deductions under Section 80M of the Income Tax Act when divi...
Income Tax : Bombay HC in Hindustan Export & Import Corporation Private Limited Vs DCIT held that sharing newspaper cuttings alone did not meet...
Company Law : NFRA issues order penalizing CA Pawan Jain and Mis Kumar Jain & Associates for lapses in issuing reports under Income Tax Act for ...
Income Tax : Check out Income Tax Notification 57/2023 issued by the Ministry of Finance, offering tax deduction relaxation for ship lease paym...
Income Tax : Circular No. 13/2023-Income Tax: The government allows condonation of delay for filing returns of income claiming deduction u/s 80...
Income Tax : CBDT issued Notification No. 34/2023-Income Tax, dated May 30, 2023 & introduces amendments to rule 11AA of Income-tax Rules, ...
Income Tax : Submission of certificate for claiming deductions U/s. 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of donation made by an employee ...
Petitioner had filed the application for registration on 23rd September, 2006 after the 2002, Scheme had come to an end, as the scheme was applicable only upto 31 st March, 2006. The industrial park set up by them was not operational/functional by 31st March, 2006. It became operational on a subsequent date. The completion certificate for the said park issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation is dated 29th August, 2007. The petitioner cannot, therefore, claim notification under the 2002, Scheme.
ITO Vs. Hindustan Oil Exploration Co. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)- Definition given in Explanation to sec. 42, section 293A as well as in various clauses of Production Sharing Contract it does not require to undergo any process of any physical or composition change but after the process of separation of gas, water and other sedimentary elements become commercial commodity. Therefore, commercial production of mineral oil as per sec. 80IB (9) involves the activity of extracting oil from underneath of surface and transport it for sale and nothing else.
ACG Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd Vs. CIT (Supreme Court)- Memorandum explaining the clauses of the Finance Bill, 1991 contained in the circular dated 19.12.1991 of the Central Board of Direct Taxes to come to the conclusion that the Parliament intended to exclude items which were unrelated to the export turnover from the computation of deduction and while excluding such items which are unrelated to export for the purpose of Section 80HHC, Parliament has taken due note of the fact that the exporter assessee would have incurred such expenditure in earning the profits and to avoid a distorted figure of export profits
CIT vs Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals (SC) – Supreme Court has on 08.02.2012 reversed Bombay High Court Judgment in the case of CIT vs Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals and confirming the decision of Special bench of ITAT Mumbai in the case of Topman Exports vs. ITO held as follows:- Objective of DEPB scheme is to neutralize the incidence of customs duty on the import content of the export products. Hence, it has direct nexus with the cost of the imports made by an exporter for manufacturing the export products.
Learn about the Supreme Court’s decision in Al-Kabeer Exports Ltd Vs. CIT, reversing the High Court’s ruling and affirming the Tribunal’s special bench decision.
Mr. Suneet Maheshwari, CEO of L&T Infrastructure Finance Company Limited which opened Tranche 2 of its tax saving infra bonds, expects huge infrastructure investments in India over the next 5 years . While highlighting the strong future prospects of infrastructure sector in India, he said that Infrastructure bonds are a boon to the economy and the tax payers.
Praveen Soni vs Commissioner Of Income Tax (Delhi HC) – On the above issue, the Delhi High Court held that the provisions of section 80-IB nowhere stipulated a condition that the claim for deduction under this section had to be made from the first year of qualification of deduction failing which the claim will not be allowed in the remaining years of eligibility. Therefore, the deduction under section 80-IB should be allowed to the assessee for the remaining years up to the period for which his entitlement would accrue, provided the conditions mentioned under section 80-IB are fulfilled.
CIT v. Chiranjjeevi Wind Energy Ltd. (2011) 333 ITR 192 (Madras High Court)- The Supreme Court, in India Cine Agencies v. CIT(2009) 308 ITR 98, laid down that the test to determine whether a particular activity amounts to “manufacture” or not is whether new and different goods emerge having distinctive name, use and character. Further, the Supreme Court, in CIT v. Sesa Goa Ltd. (2004) 271 ITR 331, observed that the word “production” or “produce” when used in comparison with the word “manufacture” means bringing into existence new goods by a process, which may or may not amount to manufacture. It also takes in all the by-products, intermediate products and residual products, which emerge in the course of manufacture of goods.
CIT v. Meghalaya Steels Ltd. (2011) 332 ITR 91 (Gauhati High Court) -The Supreme Court, in Liberty India v. CIT [2009] 317 ITR 218, observed that section 80-IB provides for deduction in respect of profits and gains “derived from the business” of the assessee and accordingly, the Parliament intended to cover sources of profits and gains not beyond the first degree. There should be a direct nexus between the generation of profits and gains and the source of profits and gains, the latter being directly relatable to the business of the assessee. Any other source, not falling within the first degree, can only be considered as ancillary to the business of the assessee.
Doshion Ltd. Vs. ITo (Ahmedabad HC)- Having thus heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the documents on record, it clearly emerges that the assessment previously framed after scrutiny is sought to be reopened beyond the period of 4 years from the end of relevant assessment year. In the reasons recorded, the Assessing Officer has not suggested that such income escaped assessment for the failure on the part of the assessee to disclose truly and fully all material facts. In fact the sole ground on which such scrutiny assessment is sought to be reopened beyond 4 years is that by virtue of Explanation to Section 80IA added with retrospective effect from 1.4.2000, income derived from the works contract would not qualify for deduction under Section 80IA of the Act.
