Income Tax : Income without satisfactory explanation is taxed at a special high rate under Section 115BBE. The provisions place strict liabilit...
Income Tax : Courts have clarified that purchases cannot be disallowed without proper evidence. Genuine transactions supported by documents can...
Income Tax : ITAT held that section 69 cannot be invoked where purchases are duly recorded in books and paid through banking channels, making t...
Income Tax : Detailed overview of penalties under various sections of the Income Tax Act, covering defaults in tax payment, reporting, document...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT deleted a 69C unexplained expenditure addition for alleged bogus purchases, ruling that when corresponding sales are ac...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that disallowance of interest cannot be finalized when the validity of underlying loans is still under appeal. I...
Income Tax : The issue was whether purchases could be treated as bogus based on investigation reports. ITAT held that when documentary evidence...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus when supported by invoices, bank payments, and GST records. It ruled t...
Income Tax : The issue was whether income from hybrid seed production on leased land qualifies as agricultural income. The Tribunal held that o...
Income Tax : The issue was whether reassessment is valid without proper service of notice. The Tribunal held that absence of valid service make...
ITAT Kolkata held that education cess is not allowable expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling in DCIT vs. Tapesh Tyagi case, clarifying that Section 115BBE doesn’t apply to surrendered income treated under Section 69A.
Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Mumbai ruling in Standard Fiscal Markets Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT case. No section 68 addition for conduit entity. Insights on tax implications.
The ITAT Kolkata has deleted the penalty in Prem Kumar Goutam vs. DCIT, ruling that the AO cannot demand a Profit and Loss Account for Section 44AD income. Get the details.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that in case of bogus purchases, if the sale is not in doubt, then only the profit element embedded in such purchases should be subject to tax in the hands the assessee. Accordingly, CIT(A) restricting disallowance to 25% of the addition justified.
ITAT Delhi held that commission taxed @2% of the amount of accommodation entries provided by the assessee has not been made on ad hoc basis, however, the same is as per prevailing market rate. Accordingly, the addition is sustained.
The Delhi ITAT has upheld the addition relating to bogus accommodation entries and unexplained commission expenditure in the A and R Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. case for AY 2009-10.
Read the full text of the ITAT Delhi order on the case of AAA Teleshopping Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT for assessment year 2011-12, with detailed analysis and conclusions.
In the case of Manish Ramanbhai Patel Vs ITO, ITAT Ahmedabad allows the appeal, emphasizing that the addition cannot be made in the hands of the assessee for on-money paid by co-owners.
ITAT Delhi held that initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s. 147 of the Income Tax Act by AO based on incorrect facts and without any verification, examination and evaluation of report of Investigation Wing and other material is invalid and unsustainable in law.
