Income Tax : Explore the discussion between CA Micky and CA Mini on Sections 68 & 44AD of the Income Tax Act. Learn about unexplained cash cred...
Income Tax : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings (2023) on income tax issues. Highlights of key cases, analysis, and implications....
Income Tax : Explore sections 68 to 69D of Income Tax Act 1961, covering unexplained cash credits, investments, and more. Learn about legal pro...
Income Tax : Explore Section 68 of the Income Tax Act with our comprehensive guide on cash credits. Learn about its purpose, scope, and legal f...
Income Tax : Discover simplified taxation scheme under Section 44AD of Income Tax Act. Learn eligibility criteria, exemptions, and key insights...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that genuineness of transaction, creditworthiness and identity of creditors not proved, hence addition u/s. 68...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held that CIT has not applied his mind analytically while assuming jurisdiction for taking cognizance under section 2...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune restored the assessment order as assessee neither filed any evidence nor provided material in an attempt to discharge th...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune directed addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unsecured loans as appellate deliberately withhold information f...
Income Tax : Punjab & Haryana HC upholds Principal Commissioner’s revision under Section 263. Assessing Officer’s wrong Section 44ADA asses...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
ITAT Hyderabad held that prior to 01.10.2014 it was essential for the Assessing Officer to reject the books of accounts of the assessee before referring the matter to the Valuation Officer for determining different entries and the expenditure incurred by the assessee.
If the cash sales and receipts were duly supported by relevant bills which were produced in the course of assessment proceedings, addition U/s 68 was unwarranted. Where cash sales transaction was recorded in regular books of accounts, sales were made out of stock-in-trade then no addition U/s 68 could be sustained.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that mere receipt of amount via banking channel doesn’t make the transaction as genuine. Addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act sustainable because of non-establishment of identity of creditor, genuineness of transaction and credit worthiness of the parties.
ITAT Raipur held that addition u/s 68 as unexplained cash credit unsustainable as AO has not rejected the books of accounts Accordingly it can be concluded that by accepting the books of accounts AO has also accepted the cash deposits to have been sourced out of duly disclosed source.
Balaji Janakiraman Vs ACIT (OSD) (ITAT Chennai) In the case of Smt. NS. Lakshmi, the assessee had taken a sum of Rs.20 lakhs through bank, and out of Rs.20 lakhs, the AO has accepted a sum of Rs.6 lakhs as genuine, and the remaining amount of Rs.14 lakhs has been added as unexplained credit. The […]
Considering the provision of Section 68 that the assessee has to prove three conditions i.e. (i) identity of the creditor; (2) capacity of such creditor to advance money; and (iii) genuineness of the transactions. If all the aforesaid three conditions are proved, the burden shifts on the revenue to prove that the amount belong to the assessee. However, the assessee cannot be asked to prove source of source or the origin of origin.
PCIT Vs Karuna Garg (Delhi High Court) PCIT states that ITAT has erred in deleting the additions on account of bogus Long-Term Capital Gain on sale of penny stock company namely M/s Goldline International Finvest Ltd. on the ground that the assessing officer has not made independent enquiry. ITAT held that In the absence of […]
ITAT Mumbai held that assessee has duly discharged identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transactions of receipt of share premium of Rs. 2.25 crore received from 19 share subscribers and hence addition towards unexplained cash credit u/s 68 is unsustainable.
ITAT Pune held that addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act merely on the basis of presumption or suspicion without any corroborated evidence is unsustainable.
ITAT Bangalore held that provisions of section 68 of the Income Tax Act are not applicable to the remittance made in India by non-resident.
