Income Tax : ITAT held that execution of a registered joint development agreement amounts to transfer of land. Capital gains timing must be det...
Income Tax : Learn about capital gains tax exemptions under Sections 54 to 54GB of the Income Tax Act, conditions for eligibility, and withdraw...
Income Tax : This report provides a consolidated overview of the critical monetary threshold limits stipulated under various sections of the In...
Income Tax : Sections 54 to 54GA allow capital gains exemptions if sale proceeds are reinvested in specific assets. These cover residential pro...
Income Tax : Overview of exemptions and allowances for salaried employees, taxpayers, and businesses under various Income Tax provisions for AY...
Income Tax : Representation against Extension of time limit under section 54 to 54GB without extension of Income Tax Return due date Vidarbha I...
CA, CS, CMA, Income Tax : We have not noticed any heed being extended towards various issues and possible solutions we have proposed through those represent...
Income Tax : KSCAA has requested to Hon’ble Minister of Finance to extend various time limits under section 54 to 54GB of the Income-tax Act,...
Income Tax : The case addresses whether third-party cultivation affects Section 54B eligibility. The Tribunal ruled that use of land for agricu...
Income Tax : The ITAT relied on surrounding circumstances, documentary evidence, and the principle of human probabilities to conclude that cash...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that exemption under section 54B of the Income Tax Act allowed since assessee is able to prove the nature of land ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal deleted addition under Section 69C, holding that payments made by company on behalf of director were properly explain...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that Section 2(22)(e) cannot apply where the assessee held less than 10% shareholding in the lending company. As s...
Income Tax : For claiming exemption Section 54 to 54 GB of the Act, for which last date falls between 01st April. 2021 to 28th February, 2022 m...
Term two years has been interpreted to mean that not during the whole period of two years, even if the land is used for some days in the earlier year, it would be sufficient for compliance of provisions of section 54B
The Articles discusses about Basic conditions, Exemption Under Section 54B of Income Tax Act, 1961 available to Individual and HUF against Capital Gain Arising from Transfer of Agricultural Land by investment of Capital Gain amount in another land or in Capital Gains Deposit Account Scheme.
DCIT Vs Indranil Sanjaybhai Rajyaguru (ITAT Rjakot) It is an undisputed fact that when the initial payment of Rs. 12.15 crores has been made for purchase of the new asset that too more than the amount of capital gain to the tune of Rs. 2.90 crores before the due date of filing of the return […]
Vandana Maruti Pathare Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Succinctly, the factual panorama of the case is that the assessee transferred certain agricultural lands and claimed exemption u/s 54B of the Act amounting to Rs.18 lakhs. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee submitted that she purchased new agricultural land in the name of her sons, […]
Taxation on Capital Gains in India (Fy 31.03.2022/Ay 2022-23) S. N. Under the head Section 54 Section 54B Section 54D Section 54EC Section 54F Section 54G Section 54GA 1 Nature of Assesse Individual / HUF ‘only’ Individual / HUF ‘only’ ‘All’ assesses All’ assesses Individual / HUF ‘only’ ‘All’ assesses ‘All’ assesses 2 Nature of […]
DCIT Vs Janki Hitendrakumar Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad) CIT(A) has rightly concluded that the agricultural land parcels being situated in the rural area is outside the purview of expression ‘capital asset’ defined in Section 2(14) of the Act. Consequently, the rural agricultural land in question not being a capital asset is not susceptible to tax under […]
HUF is owner of the said agricultural land though it is registered in the name of the Coparcener, as the HUF is enjoying all the fruits of the said agricultural land. Thus, the HUF is entitled to claim exemption/deduction under section 54B of the Act.
Dashratbhai Gopalbhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) We find that the assessee has successfully demonstrated that the land parcels situated as Adalaj does not fall within the meaning of expression ‘Municipality’ or ‘Municipal Corporation’ and therefore falls in exception provided in sub-clause (a) to Section 2(14)(iii) of the Act. As stated on behalf of assessee, […]
Sitaram Pahariya (HUF) Vs I.T.O (ITAT Agra) The bare reading of section 54B,( prior to amendment ) make it abundantly clear that the benefit of section 54 are available to assessee or a parents of his. However, the assessee has been defined in section 2(7) means every person in respect of whom any proceeding under […]
Kamal Kishore Mukati Vs PCIT (ITAT Indore) The facts in brief are that the assessee entered into an agreement in March 2006 for sale of agricultural land used for agricultural purpose. He received sale consideration in parts through banking channels. Sale deed was finally registered between March 2006 and April 2008. Before registering the sale […]
