Goods and Services Tax : Explore the critical implications of Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 on taxpayers' Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility and the ...
Income Tax : Explore the intricacies of Income Tax Section 41, covering allowances, deductions, and financial transactions. Real-world examples...
Income Tax : Whether Remission Of Trading Liability Separately Taxable Where Income From Business Has Been Declared On Presumptive Basis U/S 44...
Income Tax : Any person being Individual/HUF/Company/Firm/LLP etc. providing any benefit or perquisite whether convertible into money or not, i...
Income Tax : ISSUE FOR CONSIDERATION When a loan taken for acquiring a depreciable capital asset or a part of the purchase price of such capita...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi rules against Section 41(1) addition when no cessation of liability occurs, directing cancellation of a demand in the c...
Income Tax : Dive into the detailed analysis of Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port's case against DCIT at ITAT Kolkata regarding Section 41(1) of the ...
Custom Duty : Lovy International challenged rejection of Drawback to ROSCTL conversion. CESTAT Delhi ruled CBEC Circular time limit invalid. Det...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Ecokrin Hygiene Pvt. Ltd., deleting additions under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act solely based...
Income Tax : Calcutta High Court held that the provisions of old regime of Section 148 of the Income Tax Act (including TOLA) cannot be applied...
Custom Duty : Stay updated with the latest amendment to the Sea Cargo Manifest and Transhipment Regulations, 2018 by the Central Board of Indire...
Explore Delhi High Court’s ruling on Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act in Valley Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. vs. PCIT. Detailed analysis and implications of the judgment.
Explore ITAT Mumbai’s order on sundry creditors from bogus purchases. Learn about tax implications, sections 68 and 41(1), and the importance of accepted transactions.
ITAT Delhi held that without pointing out any specific defect in the audited books of accounts, AO cannot and should not make any estimated addition. Accordingly, such estimated addition deleted.
Delhi High Court rules in CIT Vs Vardhman Overseas Ltd. that non-payment to creditors, shown in balance sheets, doesn’t imply benefit under Section 41(1) IT Act, safeguarding the principle against double taxation benefits.
Explore the intricacies of Income Tax Section 41, covering allowances, deductions, and financial transactions. Real-world examples illustrate the nuances of Section 41(1) to Section 41(5), offering clarity for businesses and professionals.
Absence of reply from the creditors do not entitle the Assessing Officer to treat the creditors as bogus without bringing any evidence on record to prove the payable are not indeed not required to be paid.
ITO Vs Meyer Apparel Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi): Loan waiver for capital assets not taxable under Sec 28(iv) or 41(1) as cash receipt; not a remission of trading liability.
The present appeal has been filed by the revenue against order passed by the CIT(A) challenging action of CIT(A) in allowing carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation of Rs. 19,89,09,661/- pertaining to A.Y.s 1997-98 to 2000-01 for set off without any time limit.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that non-conveying of grounds of arrest in writing is not sufficient compliance of the provisions of Section 19 of the PMLA and Article 22 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, arrest of the present petitioner illegal and cannot be sustained.
Kerala High Court held that as petitioner failed to reply to the show cause notice and failed to attend the hearing. Thus, petitioner chose not to provide any evidence in respect of his claim of input tax credit. Hence, writ not entertained.
