#section 271(1)(c)
Log in to FollowLatest section 271(1)(c) updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Penalty imposed on Assessee based on his own admission cannot be deleted on the basis of a plea which is merely an afterthought

S. 271(1)(c) Admission of quantum appeal by HC shows that issue is debatable

No penalty can be levied on admission of appeal by High Court

No Penalty for mere reduction in deduction claimed

Surrender of income to buy peace of mind is plausible explanation to avoid penalty for concealment

Mere filing of return u/s. sec. 153A not sufficient to escape penalty for concealment

Penalty justified for claim of depreciation on asset not used in business

Evan after addition if there is a loss penalty could be imposed

Penalty justified on income Surrendered during survey without explanation

S. 271(1)(c) No cannot be imposed if despite addition tax effect not changes

Penalty procedding must be kept in abeyance till disposal of quantum appeal by first appellate authority

Penalty to be set aside if revenue accepts that Assessee is eligible for immunity u/s. 271(1)(c) although he is not eligible

In the absence of finding by AO Regarding Mis-statement / Non Disclosure, penalty order not justified

No penalty if assessee raised a bona fide claim of ‘provision for bad debts’
Explore the latest section 271(1)(c) updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
