Corporate Law : Allahabad HC rules no prior sanction needed for FIR against a public servant. Analysis of recent judgment in Ranjeet vs State of U...
Income Tax : Explore the impact of the Finance Act, 2023 on non-resident and not ordinarily resident individuals in India. Changes in tax deduc...
Company Law : According to u/s 149(9) of companies act, an independent director shall not be entitled to any stock option and receive any remune...
Income Tax : Any person being Individual/HUF/Company/Firm/LLP etc. providing any benefit or perquisite whether convertible into money or not, i...
Income Tax : (1) What is Section 197 of Income Tax Act, 1961? Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 allows the taxpayer the facility of NIL...
Income Tax : Assessee-company had entered into a Purchasing Agreement with M/s. Hindustan Unilever Ltd. whose main business was manufacture and...
Income Tax : Mumbai ITAT deletes penalty under section 271(1)(c) for Eureka Outsourcing Solutions, stating making an incorrect claim does not a...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that benefit of Article 13(4) of India Mauritius tax Treaty duly available to Mauritius registered assessee, havi...
Income Tax : Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Chennai order in the case of ST Engineering Electronics Ltd. vs ACIT regarding taxable cont...
Corporate Law : Board is the authority to regulate the functioning of the Insolvency Professionals and the Board comprises of experts in the field...
Income Tax : Get details on new Income Tax Notification exempting specific payments to International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) Units fro...
Assessee-company had entered into a Purchasing Agreement with M/s. Hindustan Unilever Ltd. whose main business was manufacture and sale of detergents, etc.
Get details on new Income Tax Notification exempting specific payments to International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) Units from TDS deductions. This applies for 10 consecutive assessment years starting April 2024.
Allahabad HC rules no prior sanction needed for FIR against a public servant. Analysis of recent judgment in Ranjeet vs State of UP.
Mumbai ITAT deletes penalty under section 271(1)(c) for Eureka Outsourcing Solutions, stating making an incorrect claim does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars.
ITAT Mumbai held that benefit of Article 13(4) of India Mauritius tax Treaty duly available to Mauritius registered assessee, having Tax Residency Certificate, for sale of shares which were acquired prior to 1st April 2017.
Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Chennai order in the case of ST Engineering Electronics Ltd. vs ACIT regarding taxable contract income, addressing issues of revenue recognition and accounting standards.
Board is the authority to regulate the functioning of the Insolvency Professionals and the Board comprises of experts in the field who have been appointed by the Central Government to carry out the functions specified under Part IV of the IBC.
Telangana High Court held that once sanction has been given to a particular authority, i.e., the Deputy Director of Income Tax, the prosecution has to be launched by him alone and not by the Assistant Director of Income Tax. Thus, the authority which has initiated the prosecution must have sanction of law. Otherwise, it amounts to illegal action.
Commanding Officer Vs Bhavnaben Dinshbhai Bhabhor & Others (Supreme Court of India) Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that family members of deceased Constable in the Railway Protection Special Force would be entitled to Compensation under Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 as he would be considered as a “Workman” under […]
Learn about the Bombay High Court’s ruling on the retrospective application of an amendment to Section 54F in the case of Hemant Dinkar Kandlur vs CIT
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
